At least the one on the right might be fighting for freedom against imperialist super powers.
At least the one on the right might be fighting for freedom against imperialist super powers.
I think this is misconception. In history you can read about contribution of women fighters in islam. Here is one of the oldest “Nusaybah bint Ka’ab”
There are more if you would like to search.
The islamic history is interesting, you will find many “progressive” things compare to today “extremist muslims”.
Here an easy resource from a website that usually have receipt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes?wprov=sfti1
Here is some notes to help you with wikipedia.
you read the overall sentence. Usually it ends with a source or multiple. Usually news article, research paper, books, blogs and many other form.
sometimes you can open the link to it is own specific page which usually have more details.
if you are not sure about a specific incident or don’t like the wordings, you can:
You remember when people were confused where ISIS people come from? It is the same for the IDF.
When you tell people they can get citizenship, a home, and some free stuff. People who agree are not normal. People who stay are not normal, and considering morally ethical people would not participate or leave, you end up with immoral, inhumane with latest weapons who are ready to kill their own anytime. These people don’t care because they believe their leaders will protect them and maybe good will reward them.
Now add to that the scum who for 7 or 8 month still giving them the support. I put them in the same level of inhumane, low for of people, losers.
They had no need to?
USA is a country in North America, they are the one who station soldiers in another continent for no reason and continue to work with groups in the region to ensure instability. They should expect to be attacked.
Here an example where USA and Iran worked together against ISIS
https://web.archive.org/web/20230204083535/https://theintercept.com/2019/11/18/iran-isis-iraq-kurds/
“The battle of Makhmour represented another important milestone in the war against ISIS: It was the place where two foreign military interventions began. One was directed by the U.S.-led international coalition, which provided air support and later, heavy weaponry. The other, in the form of ammunition, training, and intelligence support, came from Iran. Over the course of a few short days that August, coalition airstrikes hit ISIS positions in the parched desert hills near Makhmour, leveling the playing field between the heavily armed extremists and the Kurdish fighters.”
In the midst of housing crisis, canada allow charitable donations to these settlers companies in Palestine to go through allowing them to build new homes like crazy. They should spend that money on development within the country instead!
On another notes, they should also hire Hamas to build the Metrolinx projects.
Precision strike…
Reminder that defunding UNRAW is an attempt to make people forget about ICJ ruling.
Can you show me where is the baby and rape videos?
Can you show me a video of the attack on the Jordanian base?
Can you show me where the “weapons of mass destruction in Iraq”?
When countries lies all the time it is normal to ask for definitive proofs instead of believing them…
Soldiers in foreign soil with no legal status of being there should not be treated as civilians and be expected to be killed by resistance groups.
The US yet to show proofs of the attack on the “Jordanian base” or proof of “Iranian involvement”
Jordan insists that the attack was not on its soil. Iran claims they have nothing to do with the attack.
Considering Biden believe there were beheaded babies during October 7 attack, and the US long history of lying to be involved in wars, it would be better if they show proof even if it fabricated, before any form of escalation.
I think the best strategy is to put name of ceos and decision makers instead of companies name. Because these people don’t care about anything other than their money…
When you debate a change of law you need to think what could go wrong. One of the issue in other countries such as Canada and the UK is sex-selective abortion:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3281173/
There is no reason to believe this is not something need to be addressed in new laws when considering abortion.
For example is seems that in the UK clincs are not allowed to provide information about fetus sex and restrict it to genetics information.
In canada, there were clinic that open mainly for people to knwow the fetus sex leading to sex-selective abortion.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/fetal-gender-testing-offered-at-private-clinics-1.1183673
In the US, abortion among lower income was higher than other.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780732/
Having to abort because you can’t afford it and have social security net, is different than not wanting to have a baby and different than not wanting to have a girl or a boy for social reason.
Therefore, I argue that before a modification for a law to happen, a basic statistical analysis of abortion in the country with a few more details such as age, sex, clincs location, ethnicity and income are essential to create set of laws that support people to make the right decision.
Note, searching for details in France is tricky because need to maybe the search need to be French to find more details.
If Russia plans to genocide Ukraine they would have the war with more force similar to what Israel doing in gaza. In 2 years the death toll in Ukraine vs Russia has been exceeded im 2 months by Israel.
If Russia goal is a genocide then they need to re-evaluate their approach because they are not doing right.
They definitely comitted war crimes but intent of genocide has not been clear compare to what Israel is doing.
You can support Ukraine position but I don’t think calling Russia attack as genocidal is accurate.
Multiple reasons can be achieved if the area is destabilize. The best way to do that by having an outpost there. Keep in mind The base mainly in Syria but they claim the attack was on a tower in Jordan where the Jordinian officials claim it was in Syria.
By having a base there they can support local tribs to fight the Syrian Government, allowing Israel to take the golan highest and expanding on that front.
They can support the kurds to control oil rich regions in exchange for oil.
They can play victim if they want to have a war again in the middle east in case of economic needs.
Finally it is a step forward to the great kingdom of Israel that people pretend it is not a plan.
I didn’t expect to see Ethiopia to be there.
Couldn’t find any, which I assume a study into abortion numbers and details should be introduced along with any changes to the laws in question.
Not only supplying Israel is the direct reason why US soldiers are being targeting but also it bace the way to radicalized the new bin laden and the new ISIS. Who would target US individuals and interests every where.
While in the past the attacks are mostly is happening in middle east, there are no guarantees to fight will affect civilians in the US.
No one talk why bin laden became anti-usa eventhough he studied in western university and from a wealthy family. It is the US foreign affairs in supporting Israel that resulted in 9/11 directly or indirectly.
When I studied a niche useless field and found out modern cunsomer tools utilizing the technology has been fully studied by the defense I knew it is fucked up.
How they are going to deal with people who would abort girls just because they are girls?
It always amazes me how US citizen think everyone here from the US. If I don’t live in the US, it doesn’t matter who is in office because the actions of “not stopping Israel” and “sending them unlimited support” is the same and should be blame on the person the citizen elected.