![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ed443f52-9fcc-46bc-941b-04e8c5d74224.jpeg)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/24b1e15c-f5b6-4a90-9369-d6cf1a7f1cac.png)
Then you probably kick ass
Then you probably kick ass
Being skillful at some random computer game doesn’t fill anyone’s pockets.
Being entertaining, however, brings in ridiculous amounts of cash, if you’re “the peak of talent and skill for it”.
You’re totally missing the mark: many of these guys are very, very good at creating entertaining content. They pull more views than NFL matches on the daily, so if anything, I’d say they’re beating top athletes.
The game they happen to be playing doesn’t even matter all that much, because it isn’t about the game being fun. It’s about that specific guy being fun to watch.
Maybe this invention revolutionised how we clean our butts, or maybe it was utterly trivial and 20 different ways of cutting paper rolls were patented that same year (note that present day rolls don’t even use this method).
But that’s irrelevant to the point that seems to be implied here that patents somehow contributed to it’s success. They don’t, an invention will be useful or not based on its own merits, not on the fact they’re patented.
They exist to ensure whoever registered it makes a profit, which is why they’re being exploited way past the point of making up for any good they were supposed to bring…
I understand very well the implications of the negative price, which is why I advocated NOT to spend trillions in nuclear, when issues of balancing demand and production can be solved for a fraction of what nuclear costs.
So the innovation that was patented is literally “cut it partway through”.
Patents are inherently stupid and only serve to stifle progress. Change my mind or otherwise just downvote away, works as well.
People here be discussing the wrong thing, or am I the only one thinking that patenting a roll of paper is incredibly stupid?
It’s a damn roll of paper. How much of a genius do you have to be to come up with that? People have been doing it for millennia, the only difference is that it used to be so expensive that no one would think of whipping their butts with it.
This was my ISP and I a few years ago. I’m a beta tester for some of their features, and I argued this was necessary for ages. They finally implemented it, and now err on the side of way too many prompts for 2FA, but at least we have it.
My current beef is arguing that we NEED IPv6 settings in the router. One size does NOT fit all. It’s an uphill battle…
Thank you kind stranger.
It still took me too long, so if you’re like me: it’s a literal tramp stamp. It’s a tramp stamp of a stamp with the tramp.
This shit is like tobacco. We all know it’s fucking awful and makes no sense, but some assholes insist.
So treat it the same way: massive taxes (upon purchase, but also yearly), banned in many public places (underground parking, city centers, …) and there you go.
Data privacy AND not having to deal with more bullshit AI? Oh my, how will we ever cope with this… /s
I’m pretty sure I got this background image in a PowerPoint back in 97.
Seems like the current two choices in America is to either bend over and be fucked ever harder by the few who won the capitalism game, or to send it all to hell and play a different game where everyone gets fucked.
WW3 here we go.
It’s like they’re completely oblivious as to why Hillary Clinton lost in the first place.
It’s because THIS SHIT points around frantically ISN’T WORKING.
The secret ingredient to turn "Instant Spoiled Milk into a great beverage is chocolate syrup??
Can you at least wait for me to die before taking me to hell, Satan?
Not sure if I’m just missing a reference here, but if you choose the pizza you can have both.
I’m so impressed that this is a thing
As a mildly introverted person, this sounds like hell. I’d pay a tax to be left alone
It’s OK maybe it’ll still grow.