I am probably unqualified to speak about this, as I am using an RX 550 low profile and a 768P monitor and almost never play newer titles, but I want to kickstart a discussion, so hear me out.

The push for more realistic graphics was ongoing for longer than most of us can remember, and it made sense for most of its lifespan, as anyone who looked at an older game can confirm - I am a person who has fun making fun of weird looking 3D people.

But I feel games’ graphics have reached the point of diminishing returns, AAA studios of today spend millions of dollars just to match the graphics’ level of their previous titles - often sacrificing other, more important things on the way, and that people are unnecessarily spending lots of money on electricity consuming heat generating GPUs.

I understand getting an expensive GPU for high resolution, high refresh rate gaming but for 1080P? you shouldn’t need anything more powerful than a 1080 TI for years. I think game studios should just slow down their graphical improvements, as they are unnecessary - in my opinion - and just prevent people with lower end systems from enjoying games, and who knows, maybe we will start seeing 50 watt gaming GPUs being viable and capable of running games at medium/high settings, going for cheap - even iGPUs render good graphics now.

TLDR: why pay for more and hurt the environment with higher power consumption when what we have is enough - and possibly overkill.

Note: it would be insane of me to claim that there is not a big difference between both pictures - Tomb Raider 2013 Vs Shadow of the Tomb raider 2018 - but can you really call either of them bad, especially the right picture (5 years old)?

Note 2: this is not much more that a discussion starter that is unlikely to evolve into something larger.

  • Kir@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everything is ruined by marketing it’s capitalist roots, and game development is no exception.

    They push for fidelity just because sells well, the fact that this makes for the need of much powerful hardware is not a drawback for them. It’s actually good, since it’s someone you can profits on.

    Games need artistic direction and vision, much more than they need photorealism (which is great for some kind of games, but not a universal standard).

    • Micromot@lemmycook.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Photorealism really only fits a dew genres, almost all indie games have some kind of interesting artstyle like the long dark for example