SolarPunker@slrpnk.net to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 month agoFlatpak Firefox (and forks) very slow to startmessage-squaremessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up118arrow-down1message-squareFlatpak Firefox (and forks) very slow to startSolarPunker@slrpnk.net to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 month agomessage-square47fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoFlatpak Firefox and Chromium are very different. Note that Flatpak Firefox starts normally fast for me. Use the native version, it is one of the best maintained software and has access to “user namespaces” for isolation. Now search on the internet what that is XD
minus-squareSolarPunker@slrpnk.netOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoThe only “Firefox” not presenting this start issue for me is Floorp but it’s proprietary.
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoRun it from the terminal to get more info. Also run it through a profiler software like perf with the GUI hotspot. Also, you are not by accident using secureblue, are you?
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoDont mind then. Secureblue uses a strange hacky workaround for manking Flatpaks supposedly more secure. So then try the other things I said.
Flatpak Firefox and Chromium are very different. Note that Flatpak Firefox starts normally fast for me.
Use the native version, it is one of the best maintained software and has access to “user namespaces” for isolation.
Now search on the internet what that is XD
The only “Firefox” not presenting this start issue for me is Floorp but it’s proprietary.
Run it from the terminal to get more info.
Also run it through a profiler software like
perfwith the GUIhotspot.Also, you are not by accident using secureblue, are you?
What is it? I’m on Bazzite.
Dont mind then. Secureblue uses a strange hacky workaround for manking Flatpaks supposedly more secure.
So then try the other things I said.