• nix@midwest.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I suggest you read a little farther. They’re arguing in favor of spending the money on buses instead. It’s a train vs bus article.

    • BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you read my comment you’ll see I did read the whole thing.

      Busses are less efficient than trains no matter how you slice it. They sit in traffic just like cars, typically use gas or will need to sit and charge forever between uses, and can only hold x small number of people. With light rail, it can be electric much more easily, carry a ton more passengers, and uses dedicated tracks to avoid the congestion of traffic.

      Still a bad take.

      • nix@midwest.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh I see. I took your first sentence as meaning you stopped a paragraph in.

        I agree that buses are less efficient, I think it’s the best argument for rail.

        I will point out, all of St. Louis’ new buses are electric.

      • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If they start using buses in mass transit I suspect they’ll have a method for quickly swapping batteries as needed.