• HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use “probably” because there is no empirical, experimental evidence that demonstrates the existence of any kind of god. If god wants to demonstrat his/her/its existence, then it should be simple to do in a way that can be verified. And yet, he/she/it does not.

    Per the scientific method, you can not demonstrate that a thing does not exist, you can only demonstrate that it does. There is no evidence that reliably demonstrates that god exists. Therefore it is probably that a god does not exist.

    • M Belayet@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @HelixDab2 Well, if I leave a golf ball in a large field and you search only the part of the filed and take decision that probably the ball is not in the filed, it definitely will sound ridiculous; simply because you haven’t even searched the whole field. Have you read anywhere that someone or group belonged to science has mentioned that we have searched the whole universe and didn’t found God? I am sure you haven’t.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And yet, here you are claiming to have found god right here. And what is your falsifiable evidence, exactly? What empirical proof do you have? What experiments have you run, and what kind of control groups did you have?

        You are making the claim that a god exists, so give me your evidence.