• kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    Right. Filing taxes should only be necessary if you have itemized writeoffs or wish to contest the IRS’s statement of your tax liability. They already know what you earned their your employer, what’s been paid in taxes, what basic credits your qualify for, etc. They know what you owe so long as you didn’t have expenses to apply for that they couldn’t assume or know about. The only reason they don’t already do that or, at least until now, have a free public system for filing, it’s because tax companies have lobbied for decades to be able to milk the public for cash to help them file and navigate their tax liability.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      The argument has been since free filing means only the wealthy will hire accountants, free filing would discriminate against the poor given a few mistakes will be made here and there.

      I may not need to mention that disingenuous argument is made by the pirates at Intuit and their lobbyists.

      • PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        free filing would discriminate against the poor

        As opposed to the current system where the richest among us can hire a whole team of accountants to find every deduction possible?

          • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            It should also be noted that if the vast majority of people do nothing special on their taxes and just accept the government’s assessment, then that leaves a much smaller group of people to be audited. And a much larger portion of those people will be those who are trying to weasel their way out of paying their share. Right now, with the IRS being criminally underfunded, they only focus on low hanging fruit, the small fries. With those people being boiler plater auto-accepting tax payers, that would mean the IRS has no reason to audit them and can focus on the big boys where the real cheats are. That’s another big reason we do not have that sort of system and why the IRS is currently so underfunded (despite every dollar spent on the IRS generating between 5 and 9 dollars in revenue from tax fraud/evasion). Those kinds of people pay to make sure it doesn’t happen.

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Holy Christ someone using disingenuous appropriately, I’d almost given up on the word. Thanks for saving it!

    • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      They know what you owe so long as you didn’t have expenses to apply for that they couldn’t assume or know about

      Solo 401ks/IRA also wouldn’t be something they know about until you file if I understand correctly. Guess you could that expenses?

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        They would go in the sections for 401ks and IRAs just like they do on the paper forms. The online form will have the same way to enter the additional deductions.

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They should (and do?) have the same information your employer, bank, or brokerage files. i.e. the same forms you use to fill out your taxes now. They know what you contributed to you 401k and your other retirement accounts.