• alekwithak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I mean the source you provided literally says the bottom canines are less pointy and pronounced than the top set, especially in humans, so I don’t feel very corrected? You keep at it though, I believe in you!

      • alekwithak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Go rip some fresh animal flesh straight off the bone with those pointy bad boys then, bb.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      says the bottom canines

      The bottom what? Bottom canines? So you’re arguing they’re not what they are literally called?

      • alekwithak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Still dying to know how the tooth’s name at all indicates anything of its function. Canines are literally omnivores. Most primates use theirs for fighting. So please, if you’re done with the ad hominem I’d love to see you try to defend this here comment.

          • alekwithak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            “garbage” ‘gibbering nonsense’

            Are you a conservative by chance? Masterfully sidestepping the question yet again!

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Are you a conservative by chance?

              Was that meant as an ad hominem? I thought you didn’t like those.

              Garbage was a reference to what you were adding to the “discussion”, not you as a person, so doesn’t qualify as ad hominem.

              Same for gibbering nonsense.

      • alekwithak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        And how, pray tell, does the name ‘canines’ factor into your argument? I’m dying to know.