A big biometric security company in the UK, Facewatch, is in hot water after their facial recognition system caused a major snafu - the system wrongly identified a 19-year-old girl as a shoplifter.

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, which is a really good number and allows for near complete elimination of false matches along this vector.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I promise bro it’ll only starve like 400 people please bro I need this

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        No you misunderstood. That is a reduction in commonality by a literal factor of one million. Any secondary verification point is sufficient to reduce the false positive rate to effectively zero.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Which means the face recognition was never necessary. It’s a way for companies to build a database that will eventually get exploited. 100% guarantee.

        • AwesomeLowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          secondary verification point

          Like, running a card sized piece of plastic across a reader?

          It’d be nice if they were implementing this to combat credit card fraud or something similar, but that’s not how this is being deployed.