• LakesLem@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not really equivalent. Smoking permanently leaves all kind of nasty shit in your lungs and causes cancer. Also very addictive, making moderation physically difficult (alcohol can also be addictive but not to the same extremes). Alcohol in moderation isn’t really an issue. Pushing it more can give your liver a bad time, but as long as you give it a break before the point of disease it can bounce right back.

    There is a societal problem especially in the UK in that it’s seen as a sort of matter of pride to throw moderation out of the window and get as wasted as possible, but I have my doubts that graphic health warnings will do much about that. Either way it’s more an effect of society ignoring and sometimes even shaming moderation (how many times have you been shamed for going home before you fall over on a work’s night out) than the alcohol itself.

      • EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Alcohol might be safe in moderation, but we don’t have the research to know for sure.”

        Not exactly the most interesting of articles.

      • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In my books Strange Planet has it right with labeling it “Mild Poison”. Kind of changed the relationship for me the odd time I do drink socially.

      • LakesLem@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hmmm

        Still, as even they say, the less the safer. I’d say go after the low hanging fruit of binge drinkers (of which there are many).long before going after those of us who drink moderately.

        • Techognito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I absolutely agree, and I didn’t mean to undermine your point in any way. I just wished to inform those that might not have been aware.

          Drinking less = less dangerous

          I also believe that “rewards” in moderation can be more healthy than avoiding everything that is unhealthy

          • LakesLem@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah good input though. I’m surprised WHO sees it as worse than smoking. Not something I think I could ever find myself agreeing with, but honestly it seems every form of evidence/study these days has another one saying different so I don’t much believe in objective truth any more. Just going to enjoy life, as long as it lasts. Smoke literally feels nasty to me in a way that drinking (within reason) doesn’t.

      • Woofcat@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        less than 1.5 litres of wine or less than 3.5 litres of beer or less than 450 millilitres of spirits per week.

        The WHO considers that light? Holy crap… so if you’re drinking 2 bottles of wine yourself per week you’re a “light drinker”

    • Mike@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Smoking does not permanently leave anything in your lungs. The lungs constantly self clean and I believe after 10 years, all damage from any amount of smoking is removed.

      • LakesLem@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The scarring from all the heavy coughing etc?

        Still, rather not have all that sitting there for 10 years. The liver recovers from a few pints a lot quicker I believe, and even in the less favourable case of a fatty liver, a matter of weeks of abstienence rather than years. Disease of either, is probably a more dangerous situation.