Ok, I think Gaza will actually do better under a Trump administration because liberals actually scrutinize Trump and rally against what he does. Whereas, we get nothing but excesses for the failures (to say nothing of the humanitarian crimes) of Biden’s administration.
Not everyone who disagrees with your conclusions or world view is arguing in bad faith. I’d say calling someone stupid is arguing in bad faith, personally.
Ideally, it’ll be whomever the most Americans voted for to lead them.
Do you think the protesters/gaza will have a better or worse time underneath that candidate should biden not win?
Neither candidate seems likely to do anything but perpetuate the genocide, that does appear to be the case.
Thats not the question asked.
Answer the question.
Ok, I think Gaza will actually do better under a Trump administration because liberals actually scrutinize Trump and rally against what he does. Whereas, we get nothing but excesses for the failures (to say nothing of the humanitarian crimes) of Biden’s administration.
That’s impossible to answer, I can’t tell the future to know who will win if Biden loses.
Whelp, thanks for letting us know youre either too stupid to extrapolate on basic data or youre arguing in bad faith.
Usually accounts like this dont just outright say it like you did.
Not everyone who disagrees with your conclusions or world view is arguing in bad faith. I’d say calling someone stupid is arguing in bad faith, personally.
So you cant extrapolate on a set of data? Surely you can figure out who will be elected as president if biden isnt.
If youre unwilling to comment or participate in reality, you are arguing in bad faith. Or very, very stupid.
So pick one.