• JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m also having a good time with copilot

    Considering asking my company to pay for the subscription as I can justify that it’s worth it.

    Yes many times it is wrong but even if it it’s only 80% correct at least I get a suggestion on how to solve an issue. Many times it suggest a function and the code snippet has something missing but I can easily fix it or improve it. Without I would probably not know about that function at all.

    I also want to start using it for documentation and unit tests. I think there it’s where it will really be useful.

    Btw if you aren’t in the chat beta I really recommend it

    • Jerkface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just started using it for documentation, really impressed so far. Produced better docstrings for my functions than I ever do in a fraction of the time. So far all valid, thorough and on point. I’m looking forward to asking it to help write unit tests.

      • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        it honestly seems better suited for those tasks because it really doesn’t need to know anything that you’d have to tell it otherwise.

        The code is already there, so it can get literally all the info that it needs, and it is quite good at grasping what the function does, even if sometimes it lacks the context of the why. But that’s not relevant for unit tests, and for documentation that’s where the user comes in. It’s also why it’s called copilot, you still make the decisions.