Lets say contentious things about Star Trek! I’ll start!

  • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Pretty sure that’s been established as the concensus by now.

    My contribution is that Harry Kim deserved to stay an ensign. Considering how often his impulse or libido resulted in disaster (or his own death), he would have been kicked out of Starfleet entirely. Lucky for him, they were stranded in the Delta Quadrant and Janeway needed bodies.

    • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think Harry picks up too many strays. If Voyager wasn’t in the Delta quadrant, he would have gotten happily promoted up to Lt. Commander of some Miranda or California and retired as a mildly interesting officer who never did anything of note (or gets got in the cold open of some other more interesting ship’s episode). In fact, that so many randos who just happened to be on Voyager can hang with the level of bullshit that ship got up to would be a statistical anomaly if it wasn’t 100% certain that some Future Janeway stacked the deck during assignments for that mission to the badlands.

  • Infynis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The mirror universe sucks. It adds nothing to the franchise, and the episodes that involve it are some of the worst in every series

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Making Sisko the Emissary added a lot of bad habits to Star Trek that went against a lot of the ideals of early Trek. Kirk and Picard were both supposed to be competent humans, but only that far. Sisko led to writers creating those whose paths were dictated by fate, like Archer and Pike.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I tend to agree.

      But I have always enjoyed the dual destiny - that time is irrelevant to the wormhole aliens, so Sisko is only destined to become the Emissary because of normal practical human choices that he was going to make anyway.

      It’s fun to watch him wrestle with the way he was raised resulting in his actions turning into a kind of pillar of faith for an alien race.

    • Dieterlan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t know anything about Archer (what was his destiny thing?), but I like what they’ve done with Pike. His knowing how he’s going to die (more or less) doesn’t change his competency as a captain, imo, just gives him some pretty good personal issues to grapple with, in a pretty Trekkie way.

  • darthelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I didn’t actually have a problem with the way Enterprise ended. Setting aside the actual quality of the episode, I think the framing device connecting the beginning and ending of this era of Star Trek was fitting given that this was the end of Star Trek for the foreseeable future.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah. The ending was foreshadowed plenty. The part that hurts is we got 45 minutes instead of the full season that they clearly planned on.

      • darthelmet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh yeah. I guess it’s kind of a shame that we didn’t get to see a longer story for the founding of the Federation.

  • _NetNomad@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    i never got where people thinking burnham is a mary sue comes from. the whole concept of her character is that she’s a cowboy loose cannon without the competence to back it up. it’s specifically a subversion of every time our hero breaks the rules and steals The Ship and it ends up being ok because they saved the day or stopped the big war or whatever. the series starts with her trying to do just that, bringing about what she wanted to prevent, and getting arrested for it!

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Janeway was wrong to kill Tuvix and the ends did not justify the means. We have no idea how Tuvix would have performed long term, but he was generally better than the sum of his parts.

    To kill a sentient being, effective in his role and pleading for his life, just so you can feel less sad, is a crime.

  • JowlesMcGee@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve only seen a few episodes of TNG, but mine is Q is lame and unenjoyable. Maybe he gets better as the show goes on, but having the first episode involve him was a bad decision.

    • Cagi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The pilot episode script was for a single episode about Farpoint, the suits decided it should be a 2 parter pretty late in the game. The writers tacked on the Q plot in a bit of a rush. I’m not a fan of the next Qpisode either, that one is just classic season 1 TNG badness, riffing too hard on classic trek before they found their own voice. His appearances get better and better.

    • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The love the mythos of Q and I love John de Lancie’s portrayal of it.

      And yet I hated every Q episode I ever watched and I’ll never watch them again.

      Maybe it just works better as a thought experiment than sci-fi drama. 🤷

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Q Civil War on Voy has always been my favorite. Suzie Plakson (and her hair) just overshadow everyone and everything else in that episode.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If time travel is said to be impossible yet it is so easily achieved in so many story lines in Star Trek than why didn’t they just invent a safe way to travel between periods.

    And if there is an eventual temporal war than everything gets destroyed and all life is wiped out in the galaxy. There would have eventually been an extremist group that would have taken the technology to it’s fullest limits and traveled back to a period when the galaxy was very young. They would have severely altered everything to the point of not making any future possible.

    It always annoyed me that engineers, scientists and technicians could always find a way to travel back and forth through time “just this once because of this reason” … yet no one takes up the science to recreate the event and bake technology to purposely travel back and forth through time.

    • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think the shows have actually fielded this issue rather well. Temporal investigations was the start, then the timecops in Voyager and SNW. The Trek timeline is in a constant state of flux to the point that the TOS bridge and the SNW bridge are supposed to be the same place, and the fact that time travel is so easy is a great explanation for how everything in the ‘past’ and future keeps changing on the whims of producers at Paramount.

        • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I love Neelix, with his toxic positivity and being a perfect foil for Tuvok. Mostly been looking for an excuse to use that gif.

          • TotallyNotSpez@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s fair, I’m always amazed about how you come up with the most bonkers GIFs in almost every Star Trek thread.

            • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              They’re not mine. I just have a knack for sourcing. Do a gif search for swear trek and enjoy losing a lot of productivity.

    • Shalakushka@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Neelix is basically the only character on Voyager, the writing is so wildly inconsistent or not present at all for the human characters other than maybe B’ellanna. The writers so clearly did not give a shit on VOY.

      ETA I guess it does become the Seven of Nine show eventually, hardly an improvement, but she is technically a character (mean Data with T&A and PTSD).

  • TotallyNotSpez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    My 2nd hot take in this comment section: I actually enjoy Star Trek V - The Final Frontier an awful lot. Roasting Marshmelons, singing Row Row Row Your Boat, being one with the horse, killing “God”… What’s not to like?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      What’s not to like?

      “I know this ship like the back of my hand.” bonk

  • zellian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    TNG is pretty meh. I grew up with it, I’ve watched every episode at least twice, but now that I’m as old as Patrick Steward was when TNG started, I have a hard time caring about most episodes.