• Pietson@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nuclear waste is a potential issue. Fossil fuel waste is a major issue right now.

    The fact that the waste for nuclear is entirely contained is very good. It allows us to place it in permanent storage location like the one in Finland from your video, and perhaps even launch it off the planet in one or two centuries. There is no containing co2, only reducing.

    • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Putting highly radioactive waste on a rocket is a bad, bad idea.

      And guess what: solar and wind have neither CO2 nor nuclear waste as a product, and are cheaper to build and operate as well. Nuclear is comically expensive, and only gets by with massive state subsidies

      • TheOtherThyme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        And guess what: solar and wind canot take care of base load. Only oil, gas, coal, or nuclear can be run 24-7 with varying output in response to demand. Choose one.

        • Forester@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Sir, this is an emotional argument. Begone with your facts and logic.

            • Forester@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Pumped hydro storage requires massive dams to be constructed and massive amounts of habitat to be turned into artificial lakes. Also, we literally don’t have enough water for that to be viable anywhere but the coasts