I had this discussion with a friend, and we really couldn’t reach a consensus.

My friend thinks Lemmy (and other Reddit-like platforms) is social media because you’re interacting with other people, liking/disliking submissions, and all the content is user-generated.

I think it isn’t because you’re not following individual people, just communities/topics. Though I concede there are some aspects of social media present, I feel that overall it’s not because my view of social media is that you’re primarily following individuals.

In my view, these link aggregator + comment platforms are more like an evolution of forums which both my friend and I agreed don’t meet the criteria to be considered social media (though they maintain that Reddit-like platforms are social media while I do not).

So I’m asking Lemmy now to weigh in to help settle this friendly debate.

Edit: Thanks everyone! From the comments, it sounds like my friend and I are both right and both wrong. lol. Feel free to keep chiming in, but I have to go do the 9-5 thing that pays my mortgage and cloud hosting bills.

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is due to the anonymity of the situation and is the same direction my own answer went. I’m betting I know where this question came from, and I’d also bet courts would lean the other direction, based on the intent.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    ive had this argument going for at least a decade. I agree with you, it is not social media. i dont think forums are social media any more than usenet.

    its why i calll my instance a ‘nonsense aggregator’, as your verbiage also alludes to.

    that said, im using an mbin server… and the microblog/twitverse piece does seem to jump into the social media arena. so my server product is now integrated with that category whether i like it or not.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I love the term “nonsense aggregator” xD

      Usenet’s also a good comparison, and yeah, not social media.

      Definitely agree on K/Mbin straddling the line because of its microblogging feature.

  • ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I think you’re both right. It’s really a semantic argument over what ‘social’ means in the phrase ’social network’.

    For me I tend to agree with your interpretation. I suspect it’s because the phrase came into popular use(see Google Trend screenshot below) and in reference to the Xengas, MySpaces, and Facebooks of the world that were user-centric rather than the forums and BBS type paradigms that were more topic centric.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_social_media

  • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t think they are. In my view, social media is either personal ( i.e. pictures on Facebook, Instagram, or Snapchat ) or short + very mainstream ( Twitter, TikTok). Reddit has too many niches that collectively make up an enormous chunk of the platform, plus it is very anonymous. I’d argue that the same is true of YouTube, and a lot of the content is closer to TV and journalism.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I think it’s a massive forum.

    I think of social media as Facebook where it’s your real name and contacts who you interact with (primarily anyway).

    But this is any number of topics you can go in and out of, with a huge array of strangers that you may or may not interact with again. More links, discussion, specialities.

    You can get into precise definitions to force Lemmy/Reddit into social media, but I’m still forum.

    • eyy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Aren’t forums technically social media as well?

  • souperk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    IMO Lemmy is a social media, it allows people to socialize over shared interests. It doesn’t need to facilitate IRL connections, even though they are likely to happen.

  • LCP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    To me they are social media.

    You can also follow topics/communities on other platforms, and on Reddit you can follow people/accounts.

    There’s not much difference.

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah it’s more like a sliding scale where some platforms are deeply about following people, and some about topics, but I’m the end it’s all social media.

      I think one aspect OP didn’t talk about is anonymity, for me the biggest differentiator is that on lemmy/Reddit you have no idea who the accounts are most of the time (and more importantly, nobody knows who you are).

  • Responsabilidade@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    We are, somehow, socializing here. And here is a kind of media. So, yes, it is a social media.

    YouTube is also a social media.

    Social media is a generic concept and should not be limited to Facebook/Instagram-like platforms.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s basically my friend’s argument. And I can see your/their point.

      My argument against it basically boils down to the scope of what you follow. Following a group/community vs individual users. e.g. If I posted this on a forum back in 1997, we’d be having this discussion in a similar manner (though probably not threaded).

      That, and “social media” carries a kind of stigma from the engagement algorithms they all use. Granted, that’s not a requirement for something to be technically social media, but it’s definitely something most people associate with it.

      • Responsabilidade@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Algorithms is a consequence. Most of social medias are profitable, so they want you to be engaged as much as possible. At the beginning of Facebook or even the late Orkut, they were only a simple platform with no algorithm that only shows stuff like a showcase.

        But as soon as Facebook starts to make money showing ads, algorithms started to become a thing. But look, it was a social media already.

        Also, was Orkut a social media? Cause it was really close from what Reddit/Lemmy is today.

        About forums I think there is a subtle difference. Forums are, generally speaking, communities driven with on purpose only, inside another website. For example, we can enter Acer website and go to the forums, which is used to talk about Acer products and support. Any other topic is off-topic, therefore deleted.

        When forums are aggregated into a huge platform that can have different communities, with easy to-go click and follow this community, there is no specific topic and you can join any type of content you want with only one account, I call it social media, cause it’s different enough from forums and the main purpose is people interacting with each other

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    yes, but the key difference is how its. typically used. reddit/lemmy is generally following specific topics while other forms of social media tend to follow specific people or organizations

    so yes, both imo are forms of social media, but brcause of how you interact more with it is different, it feels like it’s not the same.