• TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Wireless never won. Wireless have nearly zero repairability. Wireless earbud buyers are often too tech illiterate to repair and solder devices themselves, and they will refuse to acknowledge the longevity of wired devices as long as they can keep consuming new mainstream TWS buds every 2 years. Not to mention, crap latency and dogshit audio quality or astronomical prices.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’ve been wearing the same Sony plugs for 6 years now. Latency and quality is fine over short distances, and over long distances (something wired can’t do…) the LC3 codec does a fantastic job keeping the signal and quality

      I feel like you and I inhabit different universes

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        A tiny wireless DAC that allows to plug in dedicated 3.5/4.4/6.3 audio gear is going to provide far superior audio quality and latency than the readymade mainstream solution. It brings with it repairability, customisability and longevity as well.

        Which Sony earbuds of yours are these, that have magically not needed a battery change in 6 years?

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Oh no doubt, and this is definitely an audiophile’s phone. I just hope the benefit of the slight gains in quality outweigh the (imo) massive hassle of having the phone tethered to body.

          My buds are sony wf-1000x3, been using them for years. Charge them once a day, use them pretty much all the time, no issues.