Really loving the new experiences here on Lemmy.one. But I’m seeing many subs with off-topic posts. Community downvotes will help overworked mods find and remove such posts. I understand no one likes to be downvoted but it’s a necessary tool for our community and only helps users understand and refine what and where they are to be posting their content.

  • bankimu@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh crap. Lemmy.one doesn’t have downvotes - this is bad.

    Without downvotes it is not easy to know which comments are controversial. I don’t want to join another tiktok or instagram, I want to join something informative and thus a proxy of the value of the information (while not perfect) is critical.

    I thought it was community specific, but looks like I can’t downvote even on other instances.

    I need to look for an alternative now.

    • jonah@lemmy.oneM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, you will have to be sure to join an instance aligned with your values on moderation.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you happen to know what happens if someone is on an instance that allows downvotes and downvotes a post on a different instance which doesn’t allow them?

      • bankimu@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think not having that will turn this into a tiktok or instagram.

        I’m now trying out lemm.ee which has downvotes, and so far looks good.

        • jonah@lemmy.oneM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree, but it sounds like lemm.ee will be a better fit for you, and that’s the beauty of the fediverse 👍

          • bankimu@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah!

            The thing is others can downvote you from other instances. Just you can’t.

            I don’t know if lemm.ee takes the downvotes into account for the score, or ignores them. But from other instances you can downvote the same post or comment.

        • falcon@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          -1 in terms of a comment score? If you can’t downvote, yes, the score is never going to be negative.

          That’s the beauty of federation: you can choose any of the 90% (or higher) of Lemmy instances that allow downvoting, instead of one of the few that doesn’t :)

  • Superfly Samurai@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know. I like the lack of a downvote.

    If I like it, I up vote.

    If I have something to say to support or refute, I comment.

    If it needs to be reported, I report it.

    Otherwise, I exercise my own right to social media “mokusatsu” and just move on. Almost like it’s not even worth my effort to downvote.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mokusatsu

    • yuun@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, the downvotes are really unnecessary. Just a lazy way to be negative.

      Speak up, report, or move on with your life. Whatever is appropriate to the situation.

  • unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I dunno. I realize the intent behind downvotes, but on reddit this led to dog piling. And regardless of whether you were “right” or not, if the first 1 or 2 down votes, by pure chance, didn’t like you, your post/comment was basically nuked to the phantom realm.

    If it’s that bad, just report it. If its not worth reporting, its not worth the dog piling either

    • hemmes@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have to disagree, as I’ve seen posts get an initial few downvotes well into negative playing field and come back after the rest of the community has had a read. We’ve all seen the back up comments to a post like that “not sure why you’re getting downvoted…”

    • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And not having dog-piling leads to reverse dogpiling, where only those with the resources/know how to have a botnet army surreptitiously upvote all other comments achieves the same thing.

      You haven’t gotten rid of the problem, you’ve just removed your own and other average users’ ability to participate in the solution.

        • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Only positive feelings are just as toxic as only negative ones.

          Human experience exists on the full scale. To cut out parts we don’t like causes active harm to ourselves, others, and communities

    • falcon@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      you can, but it won’t have effect on lemmy.one, because it’s going to discard downvotes

        • falcon@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I kinda get it, but why would a post be controversial and at the same time not a reason enough to either report or block the user that posted it?

        • Sparking@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sounds like a good reason to block an i stance if it has the predictable results.

        • syn@dataterm.digital
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes exactly. I think each instance calculates separately the score and which posts appear in hot/etc.

  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was initially skeptical of not having access to downvotes, but I’ve not really come across a situation where I want to use it.

    My view is likely to change though as more Reddit users migrate to the lemmyverse/kbin as a whole

    • DraconMarius@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Agreed!

      I personally didn’t mind the lack of (downvotes), but really thought I would at least miss it a little more but I don’t.

      Granted I only recently joined so time will tell.

    • HSL@wayfarershaven.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s been interesting because I’ve caught the reflex to downvote - and I haven’t been able to. I’ve needed to think harder about my responses.

  • falcon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    please no! This is the reason I chose this instance, and downvotes is something I always hated on Reddit - and occasionally even HN

  • AuntyQuated@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree. Downvoting was often used as a super anonymous way to bully people. I am glad it’s not a feature here and hope that it remains not a thing on Lemmy.one.

  • CarrierLost@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree. Initially, I thought lacking downvotes was an issue as well, but I’ve changed my thinking.

    If it’s a post or comment I disagree with, I try to reconcile WHY I disagree, and then use that to participate in the discussion, as opposed to just dropping a downvote and moving on.

    If it’s a post or comment that needs active intervention by a moderator, reporting it is the best solution anyway, not simply downvoting it.

    • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Vote counts are a great way to measure public sentiment at a glance. It’s also mostly (but not always) correlated with the quality and/or accuracy of the post. If people only judge a post based on that number, it’s a problem with the people and not the voting mechanism.

      I recently had the experience where I was looking for a squid farm design in Minecraft. A Youtube video came up that explicitly said it worked with my version. As you probably know, Youtube recently decided to hide all downvotes. But the video had a few thousand views and ~50 upvotes, so I spent 3 hours collecting the resources and building the farm in my world. And then it didn’t work at all. There wasn’t even an adjustment I could make to fix it. If I could have seen the probably 100+ downvotes, I would have known to look into it more and not waste my time and effort on that stupid design.

      • falcon@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I recently had the experience where I was looking for a squid farm design in Minecraft. A Youtube video

        you would never know if the downvotes are because of video quality, someone not liking the narrator’s voice (or the content creator itself). As someone else mentioned, an actual comment saying it doesn’t work on a version is way clearer

        it’s also mostly (but not always) correlated with the quality and/or accuracy of the post

        it hasn’t been my experience in quite a few communities. People will downvote things they don’t wanna hear, even if it’s the truth, or just an opinion.

        • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re right that people may downvote for a variety of (possibly bad) reasons, which is why that metric shouldn’t be the only one you use. In addition to just being interesting and informative, I see overall negative sentiment as an indication that the content deserves more scrutiny. Not to discount it, but maybe verify claims that I would have otherwise taken at face value.

          Also, the process of manually reading and categorizing comments as positive or negative and then adding them up is much more labour intensive than just looking at a number. I can appreciate that there are some benefits to that approach, but I don’t think it’s worth it considering that there’s a native feature specifically for that purpose.

          • falcon@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess people in general prefer this way - which is probably why 99% of Lemmy instances have downvotes enabled. You can choose any one of them :)

            For me, it makes me more stressed about posting stuff, specially since you can be downvote bombed just for saying you didn’t like X book, or whatever.

            It also makes me more stressed when reading comments, for some reason. Either when I see an innocent random comment with negative points - I feel bad for the commenter - or when I end up using it as a disagree button and get more stressed. IDK why.

            So for me, not having it is way better. Otherwise I maybe wouldn’t even have created a Lemmy account, and used the “opportunity” (Reddit down in flames) to be less online - which I guess would also be a great outcome.

            TLDR: some people prefer no downvotes, but most instances allow them. Your user is already on lemmy.ml, so why do you care?

  • Briongloid@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think something that isn’t considered is that people aren’t always going to be happy with you and the ability to downvote is an outlet, not being able to give a downvote could increase the likelihood that the person responds with their disagreement in a way that results in more negative comments.

    • HSL@wayfarershaven.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s wrong with disagreement? Personally, I’d rather see words that add context rather than an anonymous downvote that could mean anything.

        • yuun@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why is that the exact opposite of what you want?

          If there’s something objectionable in a rule breaking way, report. Otherwise, this seems like you literally just don’t want to have discussions, which is certainly your prerogative but then what exactly are you getting out of this?

  • NightOwl@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t miss it. For a lot of people down vote is just a I disagree with your take button instead taking the time to leave a comment instead of refuting it.

    If a comment is really problematic better to just report.

    • asap@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely my feeling as well. I think the discourse is better for removing that button, and I haven’t missed it.

      • NightOwl@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I also know that if it returned I would use it as a I disagree with your take button as I’ve always done.

  • BurningnnTree@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah I don’t think it really makes sense to disable downvotes for everyone on the instance. Why should I be unable to downvote something on an external community when everyone else viewing that community has the ability to downvote?

    • Gunther@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree with this, I have no problem with Lemmy.one disabling downvotes for its communities, but it’s frustrating not to be able to have the option in external communities which allow downvoting.

    • falcon@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      because I don’t want anybody downvoting me on any instance, and I don’t want to see downvotes in discussions or have discussions being weighted by downvotes.