• Epicmulch@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    You need to consume to live. This means you need to manipulate your surroundings in order to survive. So you need to work to have your basic needs meet. You don’t just get to live with zero effort.

    • Nevoic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is the natural order, yet paraplegics live, why? Because we live in a society that attempts to circumvent the natural order in many ways, for the good of all.

      You should take a broader materialistic look on society, who does the work (the working class), who benefits from the work (the owner class), and instead of focusing on amping up people to devote their lives to serve the interests of capital, instead focus to reframe the goals of society to serve the interests of workers, which includes working less, or even not at all. Work is not labor.

      • Epicmulch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s an entirely different argument. I agree with you on that topic. Reframing capitalism to fit human well being is what we should do. But feeding everyone for free with zero work from anyone just isn’t possible. Saying there are starving people because capitalism is just straight up wrong. There have always been starving people and probably will always be. Feeding everyone is logistically crazy difficult. If it ever did happen it would take a ridiculous amount of work and money from a lot of people.

      • Epicmulch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I would love to live in a society where robots over produce everything. Unfortunately that isn’t our reality.

      • Epicmulch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        We can provide shitty cheap unhealthy food to everyone sure. It wouldn’t be easy but yeah we could probably do that. But we absolutely would not be able to give people the kind of food they actually need.

          • Epicmulch@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            It should be sure. But that’s not our reality. Even if you take away monetary value things still hold more practical value. Try collecting and making food for 20 people. Go outside and find all that or grow it or whatever you have to do to get it tell me how long it’s you and how difficult it was to do. Now multiply that effort to 8 billion people.

            • exocrinous@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I will play along with your experiment if you give me control of the government. That seems only fair, since we’re talking about the government providing for everyone.