• Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I live in a ‘communist’ city.

    Most people here are driving huge honkin’ SUVs and are screaming about the lack of street parking, even though they have driveways.

    The entitlement is pure insanity, and this is from so called leftist liberals. The same ones who support BLM, but viciously oppose any new development, especially anything that with affordable housing units.

    Truth is a lot of lefties become conservatives when they the issues affect them.

    • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s my experience as well. The YIMBY-NIMBY divide crosses traditional party lines. There’s something deeply ironic about seeing someone saying we need to solve inequality and the climate crisis, then turn around and say multifamily housing, bike lanes, and public transit will destroy the neighborhood.

      Like, you can either be for climate solutions or sprawling suburbia, but not both. You can be for solving the housing crisis or sprawling suburbia, but not both. You can be for fixing things or the status quo, but not both.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Somehow I suspect, if this account is accurate, it’s wildly anecdotal. Did you ask them their politics as they ranted about street parking from their Escalade? You’re sure that these SUV driving, public infrastructure hating, affordable housing hating are leftists? They just sound like NPC neolibs to me.

      • parmenides@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m in St Paul, MN. I see the same stuff as their anecdote.

        Minneapolis is the same way too.

    • 3laws@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      This must be a USA thing Latin American leftists would die on the streets for more public spaces and walkable/bicycle cites. I know I would.

  • UnD3Rgr0uNDCL0wN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I had a similar conversation about me (no kids) paying taxes to educate their kids. Amazing how its OK when its something they want, LOL! I said “you chose to have kids!!”

    I was of course joking but it had a serious point to it as well.

    • parmenides@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those are best kinds of points. Highway construction and maintenance is a market distortion by the govt, but paying for universal healthcare? That’s socialism.

  • BoBandyQuaid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’ll still need the roads & streets, repairs/repaves, traffic lights, and snow plows even if 95% of us switch to bikes, e-mopeds, and trains…

    In a hypothetical 2050 America that has embraced walkable neighborhoods and biking M-F and only using cars to visit friends in a different city, the roads & streets will still be being worn out at nearly the same rate by the elements and heavy delivery, construction, and emergency vehicles.

    Because the road-quality bar for driveability is a often noticeably lower than the bar for bikeability, many/most municipalities with actual bike users on the board may vote for higher quality road construction, which likely would raise labor and/or material costs and likely balancing out to the same 20 year costs despite maybe going an extra year or two between repaves due to significantly less civilian 3,000-8,000lbs commuter vehicle use.

    • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We’d need streets, yes, but if we eliminated car-dependent sprawl (e.g., single-family detached zoning and parking minimums), we wouldn’t need nearly as many streets. Further, if we shifted as much freight as possible to other modes like local rail, cargo trams, and NEVs, then we would vastly reduce wear on roads from the 4th power law.

      • Fedop@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The 4th power law BLOWS MY MIND. Long-haul trucking in America is literally the most destructive force to the roads they drive on.