• chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why doesn’t it seem like a false-flag? Who could benefit from this, politically, more than Putin? Remember the Reichstag fire.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        He’s been in power for a long time but he’s run an authoritarian regime. He relies on the suppression of a depoliticized majority of the population. The idea here is that he wants to make a move towards totalitarianism: mobilize more of the population towards the war effort. Squeeze those depoliticized folks to force them to declare their loyalty to the regime.

      • Skua@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        It does if you can convince them that only giving you more power will keep them safe, unfortunately

        • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          One minor detail, his legitimacy was not waivering at all. Its as stupid as claiming that bush did 9/11.

          • Skua@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            9/11 did give Bush a pretext for the Patriot Act though, and his own presidency was not in question at the time.

            To be clear I don’t think that Bush did 9/11 and don’t know who did this shooting. Just pointing out that Putin absolutely can benefit from it politically.