I’d love to live in a world where you’re right, but can you point out any evidence that ditching social media and favouring RSS would work out well for the CBC? Like any similar media company (in scope or size) that had a successful experiment?
> They don’t need Facebook and Twitter. […] They’re just addicted to them.
What is the difference? What does addiction really mean in this context?
> RSS still exists.
I’d love to live in a world where you’re right, but can you point out any evidence that ditching social media and favouring RSS would work out well for the CBC? Like any similar media company (in scope or size) that had a successful experiment?
> They don’t need Facebook and Twitter. […] They’re just addicted to them.
What is the difference? What does addiction really mean in this context?