• Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    You think the liberals that flock to that store give a shit?

    Whole Foods is run by a hard-core conservative, and that hasn’t stopped the Left from throwing money at that company.

    What about Apple and its long time track record of employing near-slave labor in China?

    As with almost all topics, most liberals will almost never inconvenience themselves for the same causes they supposedly promote. This is why stuff like “green-washing” is so prevalent - people just want to see some happy-happy-joy-joy images that something is being done, rather than lift a finger to actually do anything. While the Right takes the methodical approach of advancing their cause over years and decades, the Left can’t be bothered to focus on anything for more than a few days before they jump to the next hot topic.

        • krolden@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          ‘liberals’ isnt ambiguous slang. equating ‘the left’ with liberals is just being stupid.

          • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            ‘liberals’ isnt ambiguous slang

            Without a qualifier, I find it’s used in a negative way to ”fill in the blank" with whatever an OC’s target demographic is IMO… generally any hopes of having a rational conversation with OC may as well be be flushed down the toilet after observing that kind of usage

            As a sidenote, in a political context I don’t think it captures someone’s alignment in a universally understandable way. Different people with different perspectives interpret the literal phrasing “liberals” from their own POV.

            equating ‘the left’ with liberals is just being stupid.

            I agree.