• connelhooley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Although this is obviously a step in the right direction it needs to be followed up with security updates, no point increasing the life of the hardware without doing the same for the software.

      • Aras@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hope you mean, always make it possible to unlock the bootloader offline (to not be dependent on them). There are good security reasons to have it locked by default.

        • Emerald_Earth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes. No more of that unlock code nonsense. Even Fairphone has an online bootloader unlocking process. I hate it.

    • PlutoParty@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      While it is certainly nice to have continued support, I think I’d disagree that forcing companies to maintain software on legacy/outdated hardware is something that should be legislated. I think that would greatly stifle innovation in a lot of cases.

      I’d be a supporter of something like @Emerald_Earth@lemmy.world’s suggestion, though. If they are no longer able to support security updates, then they should open it up to be able to maintain it yourself/community-maintainable. Expecting a company to maintain support through continued development on a 10 or 20 year old device that in some cases may not even be physically able to handle the updates is a big ask.