• deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Hmm.

      One group uses the threat of eternal damnation to compel moral behaviour, the other has no external compulsion*.

      Which group is likely to have more “good” members?

      * Yeah, laws? Social etiquette?

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        One occasionally wishes it would be more . . . compelling. For those in the make it up as you go along Christofascist crowd, hell has most assuredly lost its heat.

        It’s not like they’re going to make up anything bad in the afterlife for those in the “in” group: if they think there’s a hell at all, it’s always and only for The Other.

        So at least we know where they’re headed after they die and realize there’s no vice beyond the pearly gates.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      i think this probably has more to do with serial killers having disregard for shit in general, than atheists having disregard for religion.

      Statistically it checks out that someone who doesn’t care about torture, murder, and violence, probably gives even less of a shit about religion lol.