Someone forgot that bike lanes should actually have space for a bike. And maybe not cobblestones.

Legally, combined footpath/bike lanes over here should have a minimum width of 2.3m. Between line and tree there is less than 0.8m.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fucking millennials, first there’s too few trees, now there’s too many, can’t make up their minds, can they. /s

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Two nuns are riding their bikes back to the convent:

    Nun1 looks around at the scenery and says “Strange, I’ve never come this way before”

    Nun2 replies, “yeah, it’s the cobblestones”

    • Square Singer@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I could teleport, I wouldn’t bike ;)

      Yeah, bike paths always have least priority. Their main point is to show up in the “Our city has X kilometers of bike path” statistic.

  • Matt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is just bike lanes in general, it feels like they’re just painted in randomly to shut people up, except they’re just not practically useful.

    • aeharding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Engineers love painted bike lanes because they are shoulders/“recovery zones” for cars, but they can sell them as bike infrastructure

      insert go ahead, die meme here

  • Thadrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And maybe not cobblestones.

    We have a bunch of paths where bikes and pedestrians have their own lanes side by side (both way to narrow, but that’s not the point). The pedestrian half is flat tarmac, the bike half is tiles like above. Really annoying.

  • Dougas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is not mildly infuriating. This is extremely infuriating. But at least you have bike lanes

    • Square Singer@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure about that. This path was built in 1967. Could be they planted some slim trees and forgot that trees tend to grow.

    • LizardKing15@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have many of these where I live. The worst part is that the police will fine cyclists and scooter riders for riding on the road. So everyone is forced onto the sidewalk where scooters scoot between pensioners, kids, and mothers with strollers. What an idiotic backwards system. Peasants, give way to cars. Fudalistic mentality.

      • mekkagodzilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You live in the US I presume?

        Here in Lyon, France, the local government is removing car lanes downtown so we get wider bike lanes. Some are not happy about it, but if you look at the number of people passing through at rush hour, cyclists really outnumber cars, and bike traffic is never jammed.