• Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    8 months ago

    Benches are just so nice. The value-to-price proposition is amazing and I don’t see why any city would disagree with this other than incompetence. I recently ordered a bench for a little public garden in my neighbourhood and plopped it there for 100usd. People love it :)

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      8 months ago

      Cities discourage benches because the homeless might use them and that would mean acknowledging the homeless exist.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s not always the case tho. Sometimes cities just forget benches exist. My town has no real homeless issues but still lacks of benches for some reason and the public parks team would rather spend the money on touristy shit like “dancing fountains” smh

      • wildcherry@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        They did that in my city. They build a whole station with zero benches because according to the asshole architect, “station are meant to board train, not to wait”.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s more that it makes the area unpleasant and even perhaps dangerous to others. Sucks but it is what it is