This is basically saying you’re pro-Cartel or whatever gross group will seize power through violence, whether they realize it or not. It’s as misguided as libertarianism.
Huh? I dont really understand what you mean and dont really see the connection with the text.
In case you want to debate anarchist ideas or have questions about anarchism, please make that more clear.
Edit: Maybe I get what you mean and I dont agree. When a popular movement manages to abolish the state / goverment, why would pro Cartel gangs be able to just take over? Its not like the popular movement that was able to defeat the state just stops existing.
This is basically saying you’re pro-Cartel or whatever gross group will seize power through violence, whether they realize it or not. It’s as misguided as libertarianism.
Huh? I dont really understand what you mean and dont really see the connection with the text.
In case you want to debate anarchist ideas or have questions about anarchism, please make that more clear.
Edit: Maybe I get what you mean and I dont agree. When a popular movement manages to abolish the state / goverment, why would pro Cartel gangs be able to just take over? Its not like the popular movement that was able to defeat the state just stops existing.
This seems to be a point a lot of people struggle to grasp while discussing theory. Reality isn’t a turn-based game.
I think he was quite clear lol