Previously LGPL, now re-licensed as closed-source/commercial. Previous code taken down.

Commercial users pay $99/year, free for personal use but each user has to make a free account after a trial period.

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Fork the last commit with a LGPL commit?

    GPL mentions explicitly that it is irrevocable, where as LGPL doesn’t mention anything about it. IANAL, but it looks like there is a case for irrevocable without violation of clauses by default https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/4012/are-licenses-irrevocable-by-default#4013

    For people considering contributing to FOSS in the future, maybe check for irrevocable clauses? I wish licenses selectors https://choosealicense.com highlighted this part more clearly.

    • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Also depends on the contributions terms.

      If they were a traditional FOSS, they can’t change the terms without all contributors agreeing or removing/modifying the contributed code so that they no longer have ownership of their authored sections.

      Either way, it’s a dick move.