• Spliffman1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thanks for the clarification, from my limited knowledge and research they are a specialized type of cell… So kinda wrong to say categorically that they are not cells. Correct?

    • kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yep! You’re totally correct. They’re indeed highly specialized, it’s a chain that starts with a proerythroblast that would look more like a “normal” cell going all the way to the erythrocyte, the familiar red blood cell.

      Very frequently in biology we create definitions and groupings that get more and more specific, but without taking away from the original group: for instance, carnivores are a specific group of animals with specialized characteristics… But they’re still mammals. And mammals are still animals. And animals are still Eukaryotes. And so on.

      Cells do not follow the same type of definitions that we would use for groupings, but the logic still applies - losing a nucleus won’t make this cell suddenly not a cell. In fact, the membrane is still highly dynamic, there are still internal and external communication mechanisms, and there’s a metabolism - glycolysis.