• blueson@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I think my largest issue was that they argued their point using a google-summary of an article. Thanks for linking the actual source.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I lived in a small town, and the cops were convinced that people were selling drugs at the Burger King.

    So they had one of the new cops go undercover there for three months, and all they managed to get was some idiots who had a gram of weed (in a medical state) and five vicodin pills. The judge threw it out and warned the town about wasting the court’s time.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        He knew he had a lot bigger fish to fry than two kids who stole drugs from their grandmother to get their coworker to stop bothering them about it.

        • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          One of my favourite legal principles I don’t see applied enough “de minimis non curat lex”, “the law does not concern itself with trifles”.

          • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            From what I’ve seen, most judges are pretty straightforward with that shit. A couple are annoying about it, but it’s mostly the police force that pulls shit like that, and sometimes the prosecution as well.

            • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Something about the police strikes me as odd. If a judge can stay uncorrupted by power, why cant police? Assuming that this is the reason for their actions.

              • Globeparasite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                a judge can stay uncorrupted by power

                funniest joke of all time in my countries they released terrorist to satisfy radical political parties

              • Treemaster099@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Unfortunately judges can be corrupted too. They can accept bribes to rule favorably and their clerks can charge unsolicited fees to lose files or giving access to judicial decisions before they’re scheduled to release.

                Absolute power currupts absolutely.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The strictest definition of entrapment is when an LEO orders you to do something illegal; because you have to obey an order. Like if a traffic cop waves you through the intersection against a light to clear the road, they cannot then issue you a ticket.

      It depends a lot on what the cops actually said to this kid, but I think there’s a good chance to make that case.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sounds like it, but it’s Australia, and from what I know about Australian law, entrapment isn’t really a thing. Australian pigs can just tell you to commit a crime, and then arrest you for committing that crime.

      Just another reminder that All Cops Are Bastards.

  • Lath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    This type of cops would throw in a bag of hard drugs in someone’s car because they know the perp is using, but they can’t find the hiding place.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They should go to jail. My personal opinion is that breaking the law as someone under an oath (law enforcement, judge, lawyer) should always face twice the punishment. Once for the actual crime and once for the audacity to do so as a trusted hand of the law and corrupting public trust.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    In the decision, Fleming found law enforcement used “the guise of a rehabilitation service to entice the parents of a troubled child to engage in a process that resulted in potential harm to the child.”

  • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 months ago

    Cross-posting my comment from the other thread here because people should watch this video:

    The only person at the senate inquiry into this that had any balls was Greens Senator David Shoebridge. Got his mic cut off for politely telling a cop to basically go fuck himself.

    This is why I always put the Greens first on my ballot, in both state & federal and for both upper & lower houses. They’re the only viable leftist party in Australia imo.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzbuFEl4M78

  • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Sadly, this isn’t unusual. Sidenote: the movie The Day Shall Come is an excellent dark comedy based on this type of operation.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Biblical old testament levels of it’s a SIN if you can’t resist all temptation.

  • Globeparasite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Why does a lot of anglo-saxon forces seems to not know what it means to investigate terrorism. Like they have the same problem with their FBI in Burgerland

  • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    A lot of autistic people are easy targets for informants and undercover officers. We saw this with the boogaloo movement. It’s a bunch of informants who are blatantly exploiting the fact that autistic people are likely going to be vulnerable to people offering them a sense of acceptance and have trouble seeing through a setup.

    The 2021 gun rights rally at the Ohio capitol was a perfect example of this. It was around two weeks after J6 and there was a supposed national gun rights rally that was supposed to happen at state capitols. It got called out by gun rights influencers who warned everyone that it was a setup because there was no organizer behind it and it was likely an attempt to either make gun owners into felons or smear them in some way.

    There was a group of boogaloo boys who showed up and their leader had signs of autism. He showed no awareness and tried getting seen with a transwoman at the event.

    They also showed up to the George Floyd protests and tried to hijack the protests to promote the boogaloo movement.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Welp, the effect of the insane american political system and the right to own murder weapons isnt gonna help autistic individuals at all.

      He showed no awareness and tried getting seen with a transwoman at the event.

      I dont know why this would be relevant.

      I had to google this movement. Autistics can lack logical thinking as well, sadly.