Mozilla is unhappy because the use of browser engines other than WebKit will be restricted to the EU, forcing them to develop two different apps.

For an independent browser like Firefox, managing two browsers is not easy, so it can be forgiven that this could be seen as almost harassment.

Also, the fact that the use of browser engines other than WebKit is limited to iOS means that the use of WebKit is still forced on iPadOS, which also increases the effort for Mozilla.

Source: https://iphonewired.com/news/746093/

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s not a solution. It’s a way for you to avoid the problem. It does nothing to help the millions of people who are already deeply invested in the Apple ecosystem.

          • LWD@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Not sure if it’s a fallacy if it’s about addressing people who have spent a ton on an ecosystem and can’t just devote more money to buy the alternative and time to figure out the parts that aren’t compatible

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              What parts aren’t compatible? And you can load Linux and Windows on all Mac’s. You can also sell your iPhone and buy an android phone with money left over… getting out of the apple closed ecosystem is cheaper than sticking with it.

              • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                For most people, time is not regarded to be free (i.e. not a cost). As a devoted Linux user, the adage that “Linux is only free if you don’t value your time” is absolutely true.

              • LWD@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                You can’t refund anything that’s not physical, for one…

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          That is the solution though, always has been. Vote with your wallet.

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, let’s ignore the entire history of labor, environmental, safety, and product regulations, and believe everything is the way it is because of our dogmatic free market feefees.

            • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              free market works when the market is actually free.

              As soon as entry costs are introduced into the market, the free market falls apart.

              Think of the costs of building factories, rnd, lawyers, etc.

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Lol for a moment there I thought I was going off the rails with my puffa jacket rant above, but your segway into “free market feefees” is far more unhinged.

          • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            voting with your wallet doesn’t work when most people would buy anyway (whether it’s because they’re ignorant, trapped to do so, etc)

            The minority of people that actually care and know about privacy and software freedom is just a tiny statistic in Apple’s perspective, so voting with your wallet doesn’t work.

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              “My actions mean nothing because everyone else won’t do it” is exactly what everyone else is thinking.

              You’re making excuses. Be the change you know should happen. Don’t be a sheep.

              Don’t buy puffa jackets. Seriously. They’re fucking everywhere now. Don’t do it, you don’t need it, they’re cheap and overpriced.

              • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                I’m already taking actions, but I do it with the understanding that it won’t make much of a difference.

                I’m sorry to break your bubble but most people just don’t care. They want their computer to play a video off the internet, and don’t care how long that takes as long as it works. Maybe they’ll care about things in the specific interests they have, but they won’t care about computers, software, and libre software.

                We, people that care about software freedom are a minority and we need to accept that. And the only way to get things done when you’re in the minority is to borrow power from the majority, e.g. by passing legislation.

                • TWeaK@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Most people not caring isn’t a concern of mine. Apple being wealthy isn’t a concern of mine. What concerns me is that the products I use flourish and develop in ways that I like. I don’t use Apple, so I don’t particularly care about them - I just watch the drama from the sidelines.

                  You’re not bursting my bubble in any way, but you are being a little pretentious.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’d like to add that even if you sell apple. The only other alternative is android and they have their own set of issues.

        For me, an iPhone that allows sideloading would be a huge step towards perfect.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        boycotts barely work, and doubly so when the company has a legion of faithful fanbois and its among the biggest corporations on the planet.

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I like how just about everyone I who’s looked at this is basically like, “fuck apple”.

    There are a few fanboys, but they are way less common than usual.

    I’m hoping Apple picks up on this and reverses course.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They won’t care, they have the consumerist crowd locked down. The crowd that buys dozens of Stanley Tumblers so they have one that matches any outfit. There might be more of us who care than there used to be, but the average iPhone buyer doesn’t care and Apple knows it.

    • sparky@lemmy.federate.cc@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean, I’ll take a stab at speaking for Apple fans, and in fact developers. (I’m an ex-employee.)

      There are a lot of things we like about the user experience on their platforms, and we appreciate their general interest in privacy while not engaging in the dirty data mining / advertising business of Google and Microsoft. There is a polish on their platforms that is best in class.

      But I don’t believe any of us actually support the App Store lockdown situation. It’s probably the biggest black mark on their record. I think they got it right on macOS, requiring the binaries to be notarised (signed digitally) in such a way that malware can be blacklisted. This is a useful security feature. But developers are free to distribute however they want and third party stores like SetApp and Steam coexist happily with the App Store.

      100% of their arguments about keeping the App Store as the sole distribution chain are bullshit because macOS is the proof. It’s pure rent-seeking behaviour.

      • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        But the privacy is just a facade, right? Like with that recent scandal about the government requesting push notification info, Google of all companies was actually only handing it over with valid warrants while Apple was giving it to any law enforcement who asked.

      • erez@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        There is a polish on their platforms that is best in class

        As someone who was an Android user and tried switching to an iPhone, I see lots of weird bugs and behaviors I never had with Android. Sure, the OS is slightly better, and rarely crashes, but everything else is a little bit worse.

        Literally every Google app is better than Apple’s. Be it Google maps, keyboard, mail, calendar, etc. But because they aren’t made for iPhone, there’s all kinds of little bugs, mostly visual/UI related.

        And then there’s all these nonsensical decisions that make my life harder. Hotspot can’t run with wifi on, you can’t record your calls (very useful when talking to banks, government, etc.), can’t even arrange the icons in “home” screen to fixed locations or make them smaller.

        I finally figured out that when Apple fans talk about polish, they just mean it looks pretty and feels high-end. Which, sure, I can concede that. But that’s not what I actually care about.

        Anyway, rant over, sorry to take it out on you!

  • 0xtero@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So hear me out. What if we took $6.9M out of the CEO bonus and dropped the Mozilla AI project?
    Maybe that would be enough to hire a maintainer or two for Firefox iOS port?
    Maybe that could work?
    I don’t know, just an idea. Crazy.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Mozilla: ignores years of customer complaints and requests

        Mozilla: creates new product nobody asked for

        Fans: “What’s wrong with Product?”

        • moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Mozilla: ignores years of customer complaints and requests

          Are these customers donating, or purchasing mozilla products or services so that mozilla doesn’t have to rely on google’s donations?

          Mozilla: creates new product nobody asked for

          https://github.com/Mozilla-Ocho

          Nearly 10k and 400 stars on those respective repos.

          A way to run a large language model on any operating system, in any OS, in a simple, local, and privacy respecting manner?

          For linux we have docker, but Windows users were starving for a good way to do this, and even on linux, removing the step of configuring docker (or other container runtimes) to work with nvidia, is nice.

          And it’s still FOSS stuff they aren’t being paid for, currently. But there are plenty of ways to monetize this.

          Here’s an easy one: tie in the the vpn service they have to allow you to access the web ui of the computer running the llamafile remotely. Configure something like end to end encryption or or nat traversal (so not even mozilla can sniff the traffic), and you end up with a private LLM you can access remotely.

          With this, maybe they can afford some actual development on firefox, without having to rely on google money.

    • vinhill@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Mozilla has a budget of around 200 mil for software development, so the 7 mil are probably not enough. Not defending the high pay though.

      Also, AI Integration into browsers could very well be a deciding factor for mainstream users when choosing a browser. So having some expertise around e.g. running LLMs privacy preserving on client hardware for page summarisation could pay off. Llamafile for example, is something cool coming from the Mozilla AI stuff.

      • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        page summarisation

        I see a future where the journalist gives the LLM two sentences and asks it to spit out a 2000 word article out of that.

        The user then asks the LLM to Tl;Dr the article down to the two core sentences.

        Same probably for business email. Jane goes “send an email to Joe saying no.” The LLM goes “dear joe… we appreciate… your valuable conteibution… unfortunately at this time… cannot consider… looking forward… thanks for … whatever”. Joe then clicks the “summarise” button and gets “Jane says no”.

        Amazing how far we’ve come.

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Firefox is the only browser with local website translation. Literally the extension is the only app on Android that does that.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Apple always had been painfull for any third party devs. Also Vivaldi worked several years to create a browser which works in this iPhone thing, and now, after it’s release, Apple admits Chromium.

  • KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    My wife has an iPad and one of the things I hate the most is that you can’t install adblock extensions into Firefox on it like you can on Android. Which is a thing that has made using the browser on the phone wayyyy more enjoyable.

    • Amir @lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t purchase & start using it from the first place. Save yourself plenty of resources. Focus on something else productive & valuable.

    • okamiueru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why would you want to do that?

      Genuine question.

      Because if it is the hardware you want to keep and not the software, there are good android based options. And if what you want is control over the software, there are also good android options. I’d recommend a Pixel phone, and you’ll always have the option to de-goggle it completely with either CalyxOs, GrapheneOs or similar ones.

      • LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I was more poking fun at how ios users who let an ultra mega corp holds all their data and actively cripples privacy efforts while touting a false sense of privacy as marketing, never ask to de-apple their iPhones