BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoAI chatbots tend to choose violence and nuclear strikes in wargameswww.newscientist.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up127arrow-down13file-textcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksnottheonion@lemmy.worldartificial_intel@lemmy.ml
arrow-up124arrow-down1external-linkAI chatbots tend to choose violence and nuclear strikes in wargameswww.newscientist.comBlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksnottheonion@lemmy.worldartificial_intel@lemmy.ml
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·9 months agoA human brain can do that for 20 watt of power. chatGPT uses up to 20 megawatt.
minus-squarefishos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·9 months agoYeah, and a car uses more energy than me. It still goes faster. What’s your point? The debate isn’t input vs output. It’s only about output(the ability of the AI).
A human brain can do that for 20 watt of power. chatGPT uses up to 20 megawatt.
Yeah, and a car uses more energy than me. It still goes faster. What’s your point? The debate isn’t input vs output. It’s only about output(the ability of the AI).