As an American who just got into f1, they are giving idiots if they think andretti wouldn’t pull in more American motor heads.
I wasn’t really even into racing growing up and andretti was a household name. It’s just American canon. He’d absolutely, without a doubt, just by his name, give them a boost in the American market.
What’s the real reason? I haven’t been following the drama too closely.
The real reason is that with just ten teams, every team has a lot of inherent market value. A team like Haas can make a lot of money just by being on the grid — from a financial perspective it’s no issue that they l come in last.
But with extra teams, the prize money has to be split among more participants, the supply of ad space increases, and the value of already having a slot drops. Sauber was worth a lot to Audi because they were allowed to compete — if new teams can show up, the existing teams aren’t worth as much, which is bad for shareholders.
It’s all about money and it’s awful for the sport. It’s no wonder that the FIA already granted approval and it’s the FOM who are objecting.
Seriously. I remember as a kid my dad took me to an IMAX film about the history of Indy Car. Mario was the narrator and presenter. I didn’t watch racing at the time, my dad didn’t watch racing. But we were both enamored by the film. I still remember some of that film some 30 years ago. And I will always remember the name Andretti
i’m american and i’m not sure i agree with you. i’m sure there would be a marginal gain, but nothing compared to the explosion since drive to survive. teams just want to keep their slice of that enormous pie as it currently is.
Who knows what the real reason is. Maybe they really believe they can pull the American audience with 3 races instead of Andretti. But it could also be they don’t want the extra competition, they enjoy their little elite club and they want to keep it that way.
As an American who just got into f1, they are giving idiots if they think andretti wouldn’t pull in more American motor heads.
I wasn’t really even into racing growing up and andretti was a household name. It’s just American canon. He’d absolutely, without a doubt, just by his name, give them a boost in the American market.
What’s the real reason? I haven’t been following the drama too closely.
The real reason is that with just ten teams, every team has a lot of inherent market value. A team like Haas can make a lot of money just by being on the grid — from a financial perspective it’s no issue that they l come in last.
But with extra teams, the prize money has to be split among more participants, the supply of ad space increases, and the value of already having a slot drops. Sauber was worth a lot to Audi because they were allowed to compete — if new teams can show up, the existing teams aren’t worth as much, which is bad for shareholders.
It’s all about money and it’s awful for the sport. It’s no wonder that the FIA already granted approval and it’s the FOM who are objecting.
Seriously. I remember as a kid my dad took me to an IMAX film about the history of Indy Car. Mario was the narrator and presenter. I didn’t watch racing at the time, my dad didn’t watch racing. But we were both enamored by the film. I still remember some of that film some 30 years ago. And I will always remember the name Andretti
i’m american and i’m not sure i agree with you. i’m sure there would be a marginal gain, but nothing compared to the explosion since drive to survive. teams just want to keep their slice of that enormous pie as it currently is.
Who knows what the real reason is. Maybe they really believe they can pull the American audience with 3 races instead of Andretti. But it could also be they don’t want the extra competition, they enjoy their little elite club and they want to keep it that way.
Many things could be told. The first thing to bear in mind is that Formula One Management is known as the ‘Piranha Club’.