David, Nate, Josh, Marco, Carl, and Niccolò are here ready to answer all your questions on Plasma (all versions), Gear, Frameworks, Wayland (and how it affects KDE’s software), and everything in between.

Fire away, Lemmy!


We were expecting to be done in an hour and we have past the 2-hour mark already! Time flies when you are having fun.

Thank you for all the questions and the welcoming and friendly atmosphere, but the devs must get back to making Plasma 6 great.

Please keep the conversation going and KDE contributors will continue to answer over the next days as time permits.

Thank you all!!

  • Russ@bitforged.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hey there KDE team! What is your favorite feature that is coming along with Plasma 6 (or even with the KDE Gear / KDE Framework updates)?

  • Sohrab Behdani@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    is there any plans for more mobile friendly applications?

    the only problem that i have currently with plasma mobile is the lack of mobile friendly applications :)

    • Bro666@lemmy.kde.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Josh says: “Yes, we are always interested in making our applications mobile-ready and almost every new KDE application uses Kirigami our convergent framework. Some of our older applications such as Okular, Dolphin, etc need more work on mobile but this is something that’s being worked on.”

  • macattack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    What is one KDE feature developed within the last few years that you think is extremely productive/helpful yet is rarely utilized/talked about.

    • Pointedstick@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Plasma Vaults! It’s the best implementation of having a little encrypted bucket to put your important files in that I’ve ever used, on any platform. It’s very well integrated into Plasma as a 1st-party supported feature, and it works wonderfully.

  • linucs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Thanks for the AUA! Really excited about the Mega Release and even more for the future after!

    My question is regarding Nate’s original proposal for the KDE goals “Professionalise KDE” if I remember well. Now, I know that the goal was changed and the scope reduced to “Automatization and Systematization” but I truly believe the original proposal’s spirit could have a huge impact on the whole ecosystem.

    For example I remember the proposal contained the plan to hire a person working “full time” on actively finding fundings and grants and applying to them. We got the Mega Release fundraiser but for example on the forum I found https://discuss.kde.org/t/formalities-for-stf-funding/9916 and it looks like a waste of potential to not apply for grants because no one has the time to do so.

    Is there anyone at KDE, maybe among the Board, who is still trying to make the “Professionalise KDE” happen?

    P.S. I know you guys just want to reach the biggest amount of people but maybe we could start having the AUAs/AMAs and similar, only on Lemmy and a post on Reddit saying that the event will be hosted on Lemmy. This would make the Lemmy community the official one and could convince people to make the switch for the “exclusive content”. It’s not a critic, just want to see Lemmy prosper.

    • Pointedstick@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      As a Board member now, I’ll answer this one. To a certain extent I ran for a seat on the Board because I realized that proposing this via a Goal was the wrong place to do it, and the more effective way to push for that change was by being on the Board. And now that I’ve been elected there, yes I do still want to do it and push for it internally where possible. However now that I have a fuller picture of the e.V.'s situation, I realize that there are budgetary concerns that must be met before we do more hiring, and KDE e.V. operates under extremely strict German nonprofit rules that make it not as simple as it might appear. Now, in an ideal world this person would be effectively self-funding, but we need to make sure we can afford them in the first place! It’s a bit of a chicken-egg situation, really.

      Note that we’ve already done a certain amount of professionalizing KDE inasmuch as it means “KDE e.V. hires professionals to work on KDE.” KDE e.V. does indeed now employ multiple technical engineers to work on various areas of the software stack, and I want to see this grow even more. But, we need more money to make it happen, and until we do have that employed professional fundraiser, it’s up to existing members of the Board and the community to improve the revenue side of the equation so that it becomes possible! That’s why I’m so happy with the progress of the current fundraiser. 700 new members means at least 70,000€ of new recurring yearly income, which is enormous for KDE e.V. If we can keep up this kind of fundraising performance, we can do so much cool stuff in the next few years.

      • linucs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Thanks for the thorough answer Nate, can’t wait for KDE world domination!

  • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    KDE is easy to use and very powerful.

    In your opinion, why do many people prefer GNOME over KDE? Do you agree with them? How are you planning to close the gap?

    • Pointedstick@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Actually Plasma is generally more popular than GNOME every time surveys are conducted. However we have to keep in mind that the direct consumers of a DE are actually not the end users, but rather the distributors who package and distribute it. There are a number of historical reasons why many distributors ended up picking GNOME over Plasma including accessibility, corporate sponsorship, an easier packaging experience, and the rocky KDE 4 rollout burning a lot of trust. So what you end up with today is many distros shipping GNOME despite pent-up desire for Plasma. It’s a great illustration of how you need to keep your direct users happy.

      And I think that pent-up desire is being unleashed these days due to various changes in our ecosystem. Plasma is better than ever and version 5 had a much less painful release compared to 4, with us aiming to do even better in Plasma 6. We also see an increasing number of hardware vendors shipping devices with Plasma on it (https://kde.org/hardware/), who had a strong financial incentive to listen to their customers by picking Plasma over GNOME. In addition, KDE’s accessibility game is ramping up hugely, and we have more robust corporate sponsorship than we used to with Valve and Blue Systems putting tons of resources into KDE. Finally, GNOME seems to be becoming more hostile to their downstreams, causing them to need to do more of their own development or else migrate to be a fork or skin of Plasma. Interesting developments.