• thorbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    All the people blaming “clickbait youtubers” or “AI bots” for this game blowing up are idiots. Its actually fun, it delivers a satisfying game loop that no pokemon game ever has, and it has support for multiplayer. It’s big enough to explore a lot, has a deep tech tree to unlock, some pretty interesting base automation mechanics, and over 100 pokemon to discover and catch, and a surprisingly robust breeding system to unlock new pokemon instead of evolving. It’s just FUN, and lots of games lately lack that. Despite it being buggy and early access, its very playable. I hosted a dedicated server and my friends and I can play together and explore and adventure and find bosses, and work on our base together. Haven’t had a game that lets me do that in a long time.

  • Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Awesome. Game Freak needed some competition, they’ve been coasting for at least a decade.

    • mhague@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I like Pokemon games for the adventure, turn based combat, and polished stable of monsters. Does palworld have those things?

      • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I like Pokemon for making me feel connected to my Pokemon, and for exploring the world with them.

        Imo Palworld had those and does them even better.

        • mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Interesting, I thought they were more… disposable? But now that I think about it, in ark, you had your near and dear creatures and then you had the faceless workers.

          • Devccoon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Honestly? I think they should be more disposable. You can do stuff like sell, butcher, overwork or fuse away your Pals (all of which are rather deliberate on the player’s part), but I genuinely think if there was some threat of permadeath or having them stolen by the Syndicate baddies if you get sloppy, it would give the adventure a greater sense of threat/risk. People seek out Nuzlocke rules for a reason, and currently I find the options for dropping your items and Pals on death don’t really make compelling gameplay sense (you just walk back and get them).

            Setting/story-wise, Palworld supports that kind of thing so I figure it’s most likely coming as an option eventually. The game is on track for some interesting things, and as half-baked as parts might seem now, it’s already fairly fun. Definitely an addictive formula.

            It’s worth waiting to see where they take it if the journey and developing those bonds with the creatures are a big part of the draw for you. I doubt you’ll get compelling turn based combat at any point, though.

            • thorbot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              I have the ability to learn the butcher’s knife, but I will never learn or use it. Just awful. But I like that it’s there…

      • nintendiator@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        adventure

        uuuuh since G5 the Pokémon plots are rehashed and banalised as heck, and there’s almost never any sensation of valuable risk or conflict to the plot. G6 literally makes the first arc of the plot “join this bunch of loser schoolers and do nothing”.

        • mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Yeah I would like a better Pokemon game, not an fps survival with monsters. The idea is that people looking for a Pokemon game probably aren’t simply looking for a collectible monster game, they want the things that are associated with Pokemon games.

          • nintendiator@feddit.cl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah I would like a better Pokemon game,

            Don’t we all.

            For long I’ve dreamed of the heights Pokémon could reach if the mainline videogame production was handed over from a small indie company to a respectable developer with a better track record such as Camelot or CDPR.

            • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Camelot can’t write themselves out of a paper bag. The Golden Sun games were good for their time, and had me hyped as a pre-teen, but let’s not delude ourselves into thinking the dialogue or story was actually good. Seriously, if you took off the portraits while characters were speaking, could you tell just by the way they talk who is who (besides Kraden, cuz that mofo likes to TALK)? Could you describe their personalities based on their dialogue, and not the character art? It’s part of why the third Golden Sun failed: it was just too generic, and they tried to stretch the little personality they could muster across 8 characters, just because the 2nd game had 8 characters, but it left them all feeling like hollow husks for the most part.

              I’m not saying the games are bad, but there are definitely much better JRPG devs out there.

      • danthehutt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I heard cassette beasts is providing some direct competition but it wasn’t nearly as successful.

        • Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, that one is real competition - at least gameplay wise - and a wonderful example of taking inspiration from Pokemon while still making something their own. It really deserves more attention than it got.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Maybe. Maybe not. Pokémon isn’t successful because it’s good. It’s successful because people want to play Pokémon. If they can have the same experience of capturing and training Pokémon in a different format and name, it may compete with them. Admittedly, PalWorld is missing a lot of the higher level Pokémon things, but I don’t think that matters to the vast majority of players, and hunting for perfect traits may make up for it.

        I don’t think it’s a particularly great game, but I also don’t think Pokémon is.

      • thorbot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Game Freak will learn absolutely nothing from this, except “People like Pokemon, lets crank out one every 6 months instead of yearly and make them even shittier!”

  • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Gotta be honest, rockpapershotgun’s coverage of this game hasn’t gotten me very interested in this being anything other than a hyped flash in the pan but we’ll see

    • Ashtear@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Katharine’s review today steps back from that flash-in-the-pan take (and it wasn’t a good one).

      No doubt there’s some empty calories here, though.

      • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Idk I guess I still didn’t get the vibe it was anywhere as special as the hype train is treating it. It honestly feels weirdly artificial for a hype train too.

        • Ashtear@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          You’re getting downvoted, but I think there’s something to this, even if it’s not the whole story. The game had a robust presence unnaturally quickly on Tiktok and among streamers. This studio isn’t big enough to have engineered a big campaign, but it’s quite possible they did some small, targeted marketing and it really paid off.

          • wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’ve been seeing people mention “the game has been in development for 2 years” and all these trailers and stuff but… I didn’t hear a thing until the game released, it exploded and now it’s all I’m seeing.

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Literally the only thing I know about it is “pokemon with guns” and “it’s SOOOOOOOO popular! You should try it because it’s popular! READ HOW POPULAR THIS IS!”

      • peak_dunning_krueger@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s just a well made game in an era of badly made games that hype themselves up bigger than they are.

        Palworld is “just” good monster collection, good combat and some good survival crafting. I’m not going to play it, but it’s very easy to see the appeal.

        It’s like the newer doom games. They’re “just” good shooters. You “just” get to go through well built levels, nice visuals and good music.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The one thing I don’t care much for in PalWorld is building structures (walled structures), it feels kinda janky and restrictive at the moment. Which it hasn’t been a major part of the game so far, but it’s one of the few things that’s bothered me about it. Otherwise, it’s been a breath of fresh air compared to Pokemon’s recent outings.

    • JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve got a dedicated server I play with a few friends, and I got really stoned on the first day and just kept building a building for our base. Next thing I know I’ve spent six hours on 5 floors (not including an attic space and WiP rooftop garden… need to unlock more building stuff).