• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Your question is a bit like asking if ice cream sales are linked to murder rates. It’s true that there is a link, but only because there are other things going on that affect both. There is no causation between the two. In other words, being conservative doesn’t automatically mean you do more crimes, and doing crimes doesn’t make you more conservative. There is a lingering variable here, which is poverty and income inequality. The parts of the US with the most poverty are linked with high crime rates because people do crimes when they are desperate. And people living in poverty are often poorly educated and can be susceptible to the appeal of conservative dogma, which is often about laying blame for poor economic outcomes, even if it’s mislaid.

    My answer is only with regards to the US and I am not speaking to other places. In many countries there is an actual left-wing party which offers an appealing alternative for the working class. In the US, your options are the Republicans, who acknowledge you are poor and tell you it’s because of things like government overreach and minorities, or the Democrats, who will just pretend you don’t exist if you are poor unless you are also a minority.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      You sidestep the fact that most conservative areas are poor and less educated because of decades of conservative policies. So, not exactly a correlation.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, it’s funny when people from rural areas hop onto social media and start sharing their talking points about crimes in left-leaning cities…and then someone explains “per capita” to them.

      Some urban areas will still have higher per capita rates than some rural areas, but it’s funny when people try to share raw numbers of crimes as if population didn’t matter.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Statistics suck. It’s not because they might be inaccurate, it’s because they are so easy to misinterpret. “Per capita” is wildly misunderstood or ignored. It’s all about presentation, IMHO.

        Number-fuck example:

        • Only 5% of the US population is _____ so it’s irrelevant.
        • There are 16.7 million people in the US that are _____ and presents a massive problem.

        Same numbers, different context.