• oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Public transportation is certainly an option in cities. Most suburbs I’ve been to at least have buses and ride share. Still, “most of the US” is rural and sprawling suburbs that do not have these options. If more people lived and worked in and near cities, the public transportation would have more public funding for improvements. Thankfully, this administration is looking into some very exciting improvements in our rail systems and offering more funding for cities for their own improvements. Fingers crossed.

      • oxjox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t know how people feel the need to lie about things like this.

        You’re telling me that in the United State of America, there are cities that exist that do not have buses or subways or trollies or taxis or Ubers or bike shares? Please, tell me which city has none of these options?

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          No one is lying. There are options and there are viable options. A bus route 30 miles away does nothing to help you.

          Ride shares are not public transportation. Bikes do no good if you don’t have bike lanes to safely ride them in.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Plus all too often, buses have been the neglected stepchild of public transit and at least have the reputation of dirty, smelly, broken, crime ridden. I don’t think that’s true for the most part but there’s a psychological part to deal with, in addition to investing enough to keep things in good running order