• Skelectus@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think it’s pretty impressive they managed to do a soft KSP-style landing without an engine nozzle.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, that’s the bigger deal. They lost an engine and still managed a soft landing. They just landed upside down – but the solar cells might still work.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        And for the record, the lander was supposed to land on its side. It’s designed to do a quarter turn just before it touches the ground, but because of a slope, it rolled a little bit further than they wanted.

        It was so close to perfect!

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Fun fact: the average laser’s collimation expands to the size of a football field by time it reaches the altitude of the ISS. The moon is 1,000x further. Despite the higher refinement of the laser used to bounce light off the retro reflector, it still takes an incredibly strong sensor to detect the bounce back. It’s not how The Big Bang Theory portrays it.

        Now that this party is pooped, the sun is still stronger than anything we can beam. It might trickle charge. The rays that decrease exponentially with distance, coming from. 93 million miles away, still roasts us. Solar power is insane.

  • Aatube@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nevertheless, space officials are describing the mission as a success, despite the fact that the probe, nicknamed the “moon sniper”, appears to have tumbled down a crater slope, leaving its solar batteries facing in the wrong direction and unable to generate electricity.

    So it’s like that time the SpaceX booster exploded near its landing craft due to missing it by meters?

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Having played KSP, this situation actually seems pretty ok. It didn’t explode.

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Why does a country with no ballistic missile program go for this sort of feat? Japan really has the tech base and uranium reprocessing ability to rocket into having ICBMs in no time.

    • PostingInPublic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      Japan got struck twice with thermonuclear bombs in world war 2, in 2 cities named Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Look it up. They are very much against nuclear arms in general since then.

      • roguetrick@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The populace is, for now. Expansions of the JDF and general worldwide rise in nationalism with Korea going nuclear, the decline of America and China being aggressive off of the Ryukyu islands can change that quite rapidly. I looked it up and there’s general consensus that they can build ICBMs in 6 months with their 9 ton stockpile of plutonium and enriched uranium and using their rockets off the shelf, if they haven’t already just secretly built the warheads and stored them.

        Seems Abe had historically made noises in the general direction that having nuclear weapons wouldn’t be against the constitution as well. Very Japanese to have a face of nonproliferation and peacefulness while also positioning themselves with a full nuclear deterrent in their back pocket.

        Edit: Also, those bad boys were simple fission bombs. Thermonuclear usually refers to fusion weapons. 6 month estimate would be a fission weapon boosted with tritium to increase the neutron flux and be a general very big bomb.

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          6 month estimate would be a fission weapon boosted with tritium to increase the neutron flux and be a general very big bomb.

          Yeah but where are they gonna get a turbo-encabulator with a strong enough frammersham that can properly (and in a stable way no less) counter the non-ionic grametes?