• Square Singer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    One relevant part that I couldn’t really find in the article is that helium is so light that it escapes Earth’s atmosphere when released into the air.

    So any helium that is released to the air is permanently gone.

    There is also no known way to synthesize helium, and it also doesn’t renew itself at all on Earth.

    It’s also the only substance we have to cool stuff really far down. That’s why e.g. MRIs depend on it.

    And we put this precious, finite and often life saving substance into kids’ balloons to make them bobble nicely through the air.

    • Zworf@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      We could recover a lot more helium from natural gas production (some fields contain a lot) but right now it’s vented because it doesn’t have enough value for the operators. Only a few places worldwide bother recovering it during refinement.

      But as it gets scarcer the price will go up. Unfortunately the already vented helium is gone forever 😔

    • Gurfaild@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      It does somewhat renew itself due to alpha decay, but that probably isn’t fast enough to matter.

      • user134450@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        from the wiki article on Helium:

        an estimated 3000 metric tons of helium are generated per year throughout the lithosphere.

        I think the main issue here is not that we are loosing helium on a planetary scale but that the easy to reach helium from gas wells is wasted. We will never run out of helium at our current rate of consumption before the sun goes nova, if we consider all sources on earth, but it will get a lot more expensive and the supply will get less steady.

    • Gladaed@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      We don’t know any economical way to synthesise helium. Nuclear fusion exists.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Hydrogen fusion plants would produce helium in the reaction, which would need to be constantly filtered out.

      Would be nice if that was the reason.

    • Zworf@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The reason the stockpile was there was it being classified as a strategic resource during the time around WW1 and 2 when airships were a big thing. It’s just not really something the government thinks they need to be involved in anymore. Though you could argue its use is becoming more strategic again.

      But anyway I’m not defending the sale, I just believe this was the reason they wanted to sell it.

    • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Helium Stewardship Act of 2013.

      It sounds like the government was doing a poor job with it.

      Edit: Actually it sounds like part of the poor job was due to implementation of the Helium Privatization Act of 1996, and 2013 was trying to fix some of it. It’s expensive and government has been trying to get out of it for a while. (The GAO also has some information).

      Every 90s democrat knows if it’s important for science, health, and national security it’s better in the hands of private industry. Also screw welfare. (-Bill Clinton, 1996)