• argh_another_username@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Technologically speaking, easy.

    A - system turns off

    B - new speed becomes the current limit

    C - reported/ticket/vehicle is disabled.

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      So in my town there’s a speed trap that goes from 45 to 30, downhill. I slow down gradually especially when there’s snow.

      Will this system communicate such things to the car? Or will the car automatically stomp on the breaks and potentially cause a spin out or collision?

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        My assumption would it be would work by limiting acceleration rather than enforced braking which could be dangerous. But we’ll have to see what system they come up with.

        I think this has almost no chance of becoming law anyway.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Limiting acceleration could also be a safety issue in certain scenarios

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Not limiting it is already a safety issue. It’s almost unthinkable that these situations would be more frequent or dangerous than speeding already is. But I’m curious what scenarios you are referring to. I can’t think of anything that is likely to happen with any regularity.