• TheKingBee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe its because i’m not a fan of the books, but I really like Foundation, it has weak points, but overall I’m enjoying it.

      • I went into it expecting it to have nothing to do with the books. I found all the characters’ behaviors irrational and frustrating, with the exception of the emperor.

        And I’m getting really sick of incompetent protagonists and impossibly flawless antagonists. I think that’s just a reflection of the zeitgeist of the world’s masses, but that’s another discussion. Suffice to say I’m tired of it being the only trope used in SciFi TV anymore.

        • Jagermo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I like both. The novels are good, but would not work today - they have been writen in the 50s and it Shows.

          The series might have slow points, but I really like the emperors and the genetic dynasty, great storytelling device.

          • r_se_random@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t think the novels would’ve worked regardless of time. The whole point of Foundation as a series was that there’s no real protagonist in the series; the society as an aggregate works in a certain way as dictated by the rules of psychohistory. The concept wouldn’t have translated into a good TV show.

            The show that we got is more of a generic space action, which has some interesting parts, but meh for most of it.

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think it’s just easier to write the hero’s journey instead of systems. GoT was good at the latter.

          • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I like both. The novels are good, but would not work today - they have been writen in the 50s and it Shows.

            “Her breasts were a smaller version of the woman herself – massive, firm, and overpoweringly impressive.” -Isaac Asimov

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I love the show. The best part of the show, far and away, is the part that isn’t in the books — the Genetic Dynasty.

    • Malle_Yeno@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      My conspiracy theory is that the writers had an idea for their own show, but execs made them slap on the Foundation label for notoriety. Because the parts that aren’t in the books, like the Genetic Dynasty, are great – probably the best parts. It feels like that was the actual story here, then everything else had to be put in after the fact to justify the universe they put it in.

      I stopped watching after season 1 because the “special powers held by individuals” angle felt like a slap in the face to the theme of the books. Apparently season 2 is better but I’m still a lil bitter so I don’t think I can do it lol

    • Gerudo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I knew I wasn’t crazy. I just can’t get into that series.