Screens keep getting faster. Can you even tell? | CES saw the launch of several 360Hz and even 480Hz OLED monitors. Are manufacturers stuck in a questionable spec war, or are we one day going to wo…::CES saw the launch of several 360Hz and even 480Hz OLED monitors. Are manufacturers stuck in a questionable spec war, or are we one day going to wonder how we ever put up with ‘only’ 240Hz displays?

  • vext01@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Reminiscent of the hi-res audio marketing. Why listen at a measly 24bit 48khz when you can have 32/192?!

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      These have an actual perceivable difference even if subtle. Hires audio, however, is inaudible by humans.

      • vext01@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I tend to agree, but the audiophiles always have an answer to rebuttal it with.

        I’m into audio and headphones, but since I’ve never been able to reliably discern a difference with hi-res audio, I no longer let it concern me.

        • PastyWaterSnake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’ve bought pretty expensive equipment, tube amplifier, many fancy headphones, optical DACs. A library full of FLAC files. I even purchased a $500 portable DAP. I’ve never been able to reliably tell a difference between FLAC and 320k MP3 files. At this point, it really doesn’t concern me anymore either, but I at least like to see my fancy tube amp light up.

          I will say, though, $300 seems to be the sweet-spot for headphones for me.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Blackmail – Evon. That’s the one song where I ever heard a difference, though that was ogg, dunno what bitrate I used back then but it was sufficient for everything else. Listening on youtube yep that’s mushy. The noisy goodness that kicks in at 0:30, it’s crisp as fuck on CD.

            …just not the kind of thing those codecs are optimised for I’d say. Also it still sounds fine, just a bit disappointing if you ever heard the uncompressed thing. Which is also why you should never try electrostatic headphones.

        • bitwolf@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Imo the biggest bump is from mp3 to lossless. The drums sound more organic on flacs whereas on most mp3s they sound like a computer MIDI sound.

          The biggest bump for me was the change in headphones. It made my really old aac 256kbps music sound bad.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They have tests you can take to see if you can hear the difference. A lot of people fail! Lol

        • Lesrid@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Usually percussion is where it’s easiest to notice the difference. But typically people prefer the relatively more compressed sound!