• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    But it’s not that simple. Back then no one recycled the can and all too many wouldn’t now. The can itself was heavier and not as effective. Plastic truly is a wonder material for packaging / it does a better job of keeping things fresh, is more convenient, and saving that weight, saving the energy going into making a can, saving the weight for shipping, is all a benefit of a plastic. We don’t have anything that works nearly as well

    We all need to face the idea that convenience items like pudding probably shouldn’t be sold at all, especially with how easy instant pudding is

    • yacht_boy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The group think around here is so crazy. Should we be using less single use plastic, especially the thin films? Absolutely. But the environmental impacts of mining all that metal and making all that glass to replace plastic with, plus the added energy for transporting the heavier packages and the cost of increased spoilage and product lost to dented cans and broken bottles, dwarfs the negative impact of the plastic replacements.

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I wonder how well PLA would work for food storage. I learned it’s made with beets and can break down very quickly.