Chriszz@lemmy.world to > Greentext@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoAnon is completely sanelemmy.worldimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down10
arrow-up138arrow-down1imageAnon is completely sanelemmy.worldChriszz@lemmy.world to > Greentext@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squarecryptosporidium140@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoWho still buys tobacco?
minus-squarecryptosporidium140@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoIt’s rhetorical, it just seemed to fit well with your question
minus-squareLemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agointeresting & weird since tobacco is exhorbitantly expensive. How can poor people afford it?
minus-squareAbucketofpuppies@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoMaybe you swapped the cause and effect. Instead of “How do poor people smoke” you could ask “Why are smokers poor”. And then you’ve already answered your question
minus-squareLemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoOne problem causes the other until it’s impossible to determine which problem came first. It’s a snake eating its own tail.
minus-squaredubyakay@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoThey take on more crushing debt, steal, beg, lie. Look at the stats on smoking and income in Canadian provinces. The two are like inverse of each other.
Who still buys tobacco?
Why are you asking me?
Fine then, keep your secrets
It’s rhetorical, it just seemed to fit well with your question
The poor (statistically)
interesting & weird since tobacco is exhorbitantly expensive. How can poor people afford it?
Maybe you swapped the cause and effect. Instead of “How do poor people smoke” you could ask “Why are smokers poor”.
And then you’ve already answered your question
One problem causes the other until it’s impossible to determine which problem came first. It’s a snake eating its own tail.
They take on more crushing debt, steal, beg, lie.
Look at the stats on smoking and income in Canadian provinces. The two are like inverse of each other.