• nixcamic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    What features does Vivaldi have that don’t exist in a FF extension?

    And using a WebKit based browser is still better than using a chromium fork.

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t know. I still prefer having vertical tabs, tab grouping, workspaces, web panels, proper loading information, full page screenshots and way more integrated in my browser instead of having to rely on possibly dozens of different extensions that in my testing never provided nearly as good of an experience.

      Implementation details matter.

    • epchris@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I could never get hardware accelerated video working with Firefox on my Linux laptop, and Google Meet (used for work) doesn’t work well ( but I guess I blame Google for that).

    • uiiiq@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why is using WebKit-based browser “better” than Chromium-based one? Neither supports Google’s monopoly. Vivaldi is not just a skin for Google Chrome, it continues to support manifest v2 extensions and proper adblockers. And the company is owned by the workers, which is super cool

      • nixcamic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Because they foster a web monoculture where the only thing that works are Chromium based browsers. For better or worse Google controls Chromium which means that they will continue to keep pushing it in the direction they want.