There’s a new one suddenly popping up in my feed but obviously the reports are being “resolved” by the mods of that community. They suggested to me that I block their community but I will not because that is how you get a cesspit of an instance. How do we report disinformation communities straight to the admins?

Edit: the admins did remove the community in question so I’m going to take that as the official stance on disinformation communities and also assume that any type of community (right wing, left wing, or other) that are intentionally spreading disinformation will be removed. That makes me feel much better about the situation since this type of thing is pretty much guaranteed to pop up again.

  • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The admin here takes a conservative stance on defederation. He doesn’t do it unless there are lemm.ee rules violations or network abuse. I haven’t looked at any explodingheads content, but if it does not violate any lemm.ee rules and presents no network abuse it will probably not get defederated.

    I agree with lemm.ee’s philosophy on defederation and that’s one of the reasons this is my home instance. In general you can’t call for defederation just because you don’t agree with content. If it’s blatantly offensive then I suppose that would be valid grounds, but I would hope that reason is used sparingly. I mean discussion that’s offensive to you may not be offensive to me.

    • Asthmatic_Goose@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s hosted on this instance: https://lemm.ee/c/vaccines

      “All reports calling post here missinformation will be ignored unless the post says that covid vaccines are healthy. Which is dangerous missinformation because covid vaccines kill.”

      • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given that even twitter is full of that these days, is a Lemmy community the end of the world? Idiots are going to keep believing their stupid beliefs.

        • dmention7@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          End of the world? No.

          By the same token, a few bugs in my house is not the end of the world, but I’d still prefer to have screens on the window and keep a flyswatter handy 😉

          • shootwhatsmyname@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            The “bugs” you’re referring to are actual people, and “your house” is my house too. We are both anonymous users on a general purpose instance shared with ~15k other people. If you start removing people from our house, and I don’t want you to remove those people, I think it’s fair to have a good-faith conversation about this.

            How do you suggest determining whether or not something is considered disinformation?

            • dmention7@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m also not advocating for killing trolls that bother me… so take care not to belabor a quick metaphor.

              The vast majority of disinformation comes in a few key topics related to current hot button political issues and is generally pushed by recognizable sources. It’s not unreasonable to expect admins to check into user reports of disinformation and organized trolling against known sources. I’m not an admin so I’m not going to write up the specific criteria right here and now.

              Choosing not to do so is also a conscious choice to host such content.

              • shootwhatsmyname@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hey, it’s okay to break down a metaphor if I don’t think it’s applicable to the conversation.

                Yes, totally I agree with you, I think admins should review reported content and do some investigation if needed.

                I guess I have a problem with removing users and communities based on someone’s opinion of the content itself. Vote manipulation, brigading, creating multiple accounts to push agenda, repeated automated posting, and even organized trolling like you mentioned are not direct opinions on the content posted. They are clearly defined and relatively easy to identify. “Disinformation,” “recognizable sources,” and “hot button political issues” are direct opinions about the content or subject of a post or community. They are not clearly defined and differ greatly from person to person.

                I asked you to suggest a definition or criteria of disinformation to move us from the “what” to the “how.” Thinking about how this might be regulated practically might help you understand why I think it’s problematic to remove users and communities based solely on someone’s opinion of their content.

                • dmention7@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Believe me I do understand why it could be considered problematic. My disagreement stems from the idea that it’s better to have no policy rather than an imperfect policy or one that relies on some discretion.

                  My point in highlighting that disinformation centers around a few hot button issues is to reinforce that we’re not talking about some nebulous or opinion-driven debate; rather there are a few key disinformation strategies that take advantage of the “bullshit asymmetry” to poison real discussion. They are easily identified because they are well documented and reported on.

                  I’m simply unconvinced by arguments that it’s too hard to identify and nip such malicious communities in the bud. Even less so by arguments that doing so is somehow a slippery slope.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t about defederating it’s about misinformation communities being hosted on this instance.

      • shootwhatsmyname@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What would be the difference between a disinformation community being hosted on this instance and one being hosted on another federated instance?

        • dmention7@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          From a practical perspective: it’s much easier to choose not to see content from an entire instance I’ve deemed unhelpful or harmful than it is to play whackamole with communities popping up on my home instance.

          It’s the difference between my preferred news outlet broadcasting garbage vs a different channel.

          • shootwhatsmyname@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Correct me if I’m wrong, but that sounds like this is about convenience then. I’m all for convenience, but completely removing content for everyone on a general-purpose instance because someone thinks it is harmful is not ok. That is suddenly declaring your opinion as everyone else’s absolute truth. Saying “you should not see that” is great. Saying “you can never see that” is censorship, and in this case it would be censorship based on a certain opinion.

            I propose Lemmy adds the ability for users to label communities and posts when they create them with a content tag of some sort. Users could also suggest adding or removing a label from posts or communities as they browse. This would make content more refine-able and searchable for users/admins and give us each the ability to limit certain types of content we don’t want to see. It would also help solve the NSFW label issue where someone is okay with gore but not with nudity.

            • dmention7@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I was just responding to your question of what was the difference between blocking an instance and a community.

              The community-sourced labeling is an interesting idea, which I hadn’t really considered. Not sure it fully solves the concern of bad faith actors looking to JAQ-off and otherwise poison discussions but it’s a step in the right direction.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Blatant lies are blatantly offensive.

      Attempting to institute a brutal theocratic dictatorship and genocide all LGBT+ people is also blatantly offensive.

      • Razp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not everything you disagree with is right wing. You sound like an American lol FYI this server owner is Estonian, one of the most liberal countries in the EU.

          • Razp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            And? Is there something wrong with anyone not having US-style far left neo-liberal views? I don’t get your point

              • Razp@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s more about the bipartisan system and very vocal representatives of both extremes it breeds.

            • AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’ve exposed yourself with “far left neo-liberal views” because nothing about America or liberalism (much less fucking neoliberalism) is far left. Just admit you hate gays poc and women and stop pretending. You aren’t fooling people.

              • Razp@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Wait what? How does your reply make any sense? You assume things and instantly belive those are true? This is ridiculous.

                • AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Because I’m not a fucking idiot born today. I’ve been around people like yourself who use language you use and complain about how far left America is. And guess what. Without fail every single fucking example of someone talking about far left neoliberalism which again doesn’t make any sense always ends with the mask coming off. No one is fooled by you. We all have seen this shit time and time again.

                  • Razp@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You definitely sound like one. Labeling people based on your personal assumptions is kinda an idiotic thing to do.

          • Razp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            You gave me so many labels, that’s Insane. You don’t event know me. And you most definitely don’t get to tell me where to go and what to do.

            Your post is a prime example of what’s wrong with the extremists on both sides. You are no better than a nazi you are accusing me of being.

            You need therapy.

            Also I am a leftist. I would say a classic liberal.

      • nik0@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you want to create an eco chamber for yourself, you could’ve just said so.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, if you wanted to take over left spaces and deny them the ability to have a community of their own so you can more easily kill them off, you should have said so

          • nik0@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            you

            Implying that I’m a “conservative” just because i disagree isn’t a good way to start your point. Second of all, I think it’s perfectly reasonable to create a space (as long as they respect that space) where anyone can discuss and formulate and share their own opinions without being persecuted. That goes for any side even conservatives. Its a good way to prevent an us vs. them mentality (which is what you’re doing by the way) and allows us to prevent hate and misinformation from spreading from their own circles to us.

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Implying you are going to manipulate or guilt trip me by playing victim when you are told you are wrong. You are not. Literally everyone who is different than you is your victim, and you are the one who will have to live with blood on your hands. But knowing you, you love the taste of it.

              • nik0@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not implying I’m a victim. I’m just saying your assumptions are unreasonable at best and or manipulative at worst. Also who are you describing? Are you ok, anon?

      • Bongles@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well that’s an overreaction. That vaccines community mentioned here sounds stupid but to say this entire instance has been taken over by right wingers because of one nut job? Is that really what you’re saying?