I considered deleting the post, but this seems more cowardly than just admitting I was wrong. But TIL something!

  • PotatoKat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s a concession of the premise, you obviously can’t have infinite anything, but if you could then the 100s would bring more utility

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      But the utility is not the issue in the premise.

      “Would you rather have an infinite number of $1 or $100 bills?” Obviously $100 bills, but they are worth the same amount.

      • PotatoKat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If utility isn’t the reason why you’re picking 100s then why would you if they’re the same amount?

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Utility is irrelevant to the statement “an infinite number of $1 bills is worth the same amount as an infinite number of $100 bills.”

          • PotatoKat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            What is worth? Would you rather have 500 1s or 5 100s? You already said you’d take the 100s, why? I would take the 100s because I personally value the convenience of 100s more than the 1s, so to me, a single 100 is worth more than 100 1s. Worth doesn’t need to imply the monetary value of the money.

            The convenience/utility makes the 100s worth more even if they’re both valued the same