• Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    They can deny it however much. The right and anti-wokism is not the majority. Which therefore means unless special care is taken to train it on more right wing stuff, it will lean left out of the box.

    But right wing rhetoric is also not logically consistent so training an AI on right extremism probably also won’t yield amazing results because it’ll pick up on the inconsistencies and be more likely to contradict itself.

    Conservatives are going to self-own themselves pretty hard with AI. Even the machines see it, “woke” is fairly consistent and follows basic rules of human decency and respect.

    • CrayonMaster@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Agree with the first half, but unless I’m misunderstanding the type of AI being used, it really shouldn’t make a difference how logically soud they are? It cares more about vibes and rhetoric then logic, besides I guess using words consistently

    • VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Authoritarians hate the freedom to not give a shit about other peoples personal lives. They want to watch you poop.

    • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah and there’s a lot more crazy linked to right wing stuff, you’ve got all the Alex Jones type stuff and all the factions of q anon, the space war, the various extreme religious factions and various greek letter caste systems… Ad nausium.

      If version two involves them biasing towards the right then they’ll have to work out how to do that, I bet they do it an obviously dumb way which results in it being totally dumb and wacky in hilarious ways