• AeroLemming@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    That seems highly unethical. 30 FPS really is unplayable and I’m sure that if this is true, it caused headaches in many players.

      • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t know about you, but I get headaches when playing first person games with rapid camera movement if my FPS is too low. I guess that must not be common, based on the votes.

        • rautapekoni@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Did you not see the part where it said “PS2 era”? The turning rates of the player/camera in any console first person shooter from those times are downright sluggish by mouse/keyboard standards, but the games were also designed around that slower pace.

          • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I never had a PS2, so how would I know that? No need to be so hostile!

              • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Because I didn’t realize there was a critical design difference that allowed 30 FPS to work without causing headaches. I’ve played my fair share of FPS games and have never, ever seen that slow camera behavior anywhere, so how the fuck would I even have any indication that it was present, especially if there was demand for 60 FPS? Lemmy truly is more toxic than Reddit 💀