• Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Isn’t that what E3 also was? xD

    All of these award ceremonies and cons are just advertising for the latest games or games that are releasing soon. Companies aren’t building games out of charity, but because they make money for their shareholders and occasionally, a private company.

    • verysoft@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes… but E3 allowed smaller devs to get an audience and allow people to try their games for early feedback, it was a place for gamers to go and experience new games, meet people in the industry etc. The game awards is literally just a 3 hour long advert for the highest bidders. The game awards doesn’t give a shit about anything but the money they are rolling in, they get more and more shameless with it each year, a lot of developers complained this year as they were quickly ushered off stage to make way for the next big advert.

      • Chozo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you think E3 was a more welcoming venue for indie studios, you’d be mistaken. Getting a booth or presentation slot at E3 was insanely expensive. If Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft didn’t think it was worth their money to have even a booth presence on the show floor, you can probably imagine how prohibitive it was for smaller studios.

        • verysoft@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          People like Xbox would show off more games, from smaller devs, you can do a lot more in 3 days than you can in 3 hours. It was sad when they pulled out, that was the writing on the wall for E3, but its not even comparable to the game awards lmao, which is literally just a 3 hour ad break.